|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
06-29-2016, 11:57 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Sooo....Lets read up...shall we. this is the procedure from your link.
Step 1: Collects identifying documents (as was mentioned, none exist)
Collect Bio Data: Name, Address, Birthday, Place of Birth (No Documents exist to VERIFY any of this information)
Collect Biometrics: Iris Scans (Newsflash, this is to help identify them for future ID in case of an issue, There is NOTHING that exists that can link them to past actions)
Step 2: Collects Identifying Documents (Huh, did these all of a sudden magically appear)
Create an Applicant File. (Ooooohhh now we mean business, we have an actual folder that has all of your supposed unverified information on it)
Step 3: US Security Agencies screen the Candidate (so they use all the unverified data collected to see if any flags pop, but since the data could be false.....everything looks good)
Step 4: The Interviews are conducted. (This is where they promise to work and play well with others)
Step 5: Fingerprints are screened (again if there is no database to bounce these against then they are good)
....and according to your link this is the end of the Security portion of the vetting process.
do I need to go on......point is....if the initial information is false, the entire process they follow is built upon false data.
But the graphic they used is a might purty....so I can see where you might be lulled into a false sense of security.
|
Well I don't know about you, but that puts my mind at ease...
As you pointed out, all this presumes that (1) records exist on these people, and that (2) there is a mechanism for verifying said records.
Oh yes, that interview, that must really cut down on terror. Because as we all know, a terrorist would never fail to announce his intentions ahead of time.
|
|
|
|
06-29-2016, 06:33 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Well I don't know about you, but that puts my mind at ease...
As you pointed out, all this presumes that (1) records exist on these people, and that (2) there is a mechanism for verifying said records.
Oh yes, that interview, that must really cut down on terror. Because as we all know, a terrorist would never fail to announce his intentions ahead of time.
|
There are records and there is process. Even without perfect records you can learn and verify a lot through process.
Big point is that no refugee can even say they want to go to the US. The UN has to nominate them for resettlement, the refugee has no idea where they are going.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 08:18 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
There are records and there is process. Even without perfect records you can learn and verify a lot through process.
Big point is that no refugee can even say they want to go to the US. The UN has to nominate them for resettlement, the refugee has no idea where they are going.
|
What records exist in these tent camps and mountaintop villages, exactly?
"the refugee has no idea where they are going."
So it's not possible ISIS would put a few dozen terrorists in line, in the hopes that any of them end up, or can make their way to, nations that are prime targets.
Forgive me if I consider you 'big point' to be worthless.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 08:26 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
What records exist in these tent camps and mountaintop villages, exactly?
"the refugee has no idea where they are going."
So it's not possible ISIS would put a few dozen terrorists in line, in the hopes that any of them end up, or can make their way to, nations that are prime targets.
Forgive me if I consider you 'big point' to be worthless.
|
I think the majority of refugees are actually from the cities.
Risking an asset that has a minuscule chance of making it to the US doesn't make a lot of sense.
It's also why the recent attacks in the EU have all been by fighters who were able to return to their country of citizenship.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2016, 08:31 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think the majority of refugees are actually from the cities.
Risking an asset that has a minuscule chance of making it to the US doesn't make a lot of sense.
It's also why the recent attacks in the EU have all been by fighters who were able to return to their country of citizenship.
|
"I think the majority of refugees are actually from the cities."
Funny how your "thoughts" support The Narrative with 100% consistency. How do you know? Please support that.
And how do we verify that someone is who he says he is?
Only you would say that investigating a US citizen is harder than vetting people from places that still live in the 9th century.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.
|
| |