Hillary for prison 2016

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Kinda like that but Even if the classification label is removed , it still can't be forwarded to an unsecure system because there is no physical connection between the two. You literally have to move it yourself onto the unsecure network so you can email it....via CD or Memory stick or something comparable.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by Nebe

This is the only reason she hasn't been prosecuted already.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, the only reason is this one: Clinton

Had it been anyone else, the legal proceedings would be underway.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

So it requires one more act of commission, quite possibly a criminal act of commission. Gotcha.

No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes there is, and we have discussed this. There were at least 2 classified emails, flagged as classified, that made their way to her server. In order to make their way to her server, the flags had to have been removed. The intelligence in question was not generated by the State Dept, and only the agency that produced the intelligence, has the authority to remove the flag. Her defense of that, was her claim (I am trying to remember), something about the fact that what was in teh email, had been reported in the NY Times already?

Anyway, the FBI is part of the DOJ, which is headed by an OBama appointee. And they decided there was reason to spend a lot of time and manpower looking into this. They aren't doing it because Sean Hannity asked them to do it. But naturally, you know more about their procedures than anyone else...

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

No evidence of this Jim.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-state-secrets

"Clinton’s flimsy claim never to have handled e-mails labeled classified imploded recently when an e-mail sent June 17, 2011, became public. That morning, Clinton’s aide Jacob Sullivan informed her that a document could not reach her via a secure fax. No sweat! Clinton replied, “ . . . turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” So, Clinton knew about these classified markings and, even worse, instructed her staffer to cover them up and forward her that document via a fax machine vulnerable to spies. Clinton’s “gross negligence” may have violated the federal Espionage Act, 18 U.S. Code § 793."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-state-secrets

"Clinton’s flimsy claim never to have handled e-mails labeled classified imploded recently when an e-mail sent June 17, 2011, became public. That morning, Clinton’s aide Jacob Sullivan informed her that a document could not reach her via a secure fax. No sweat! Clinton replied, “ . . . turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure.” So, Clinton knew about these classified markings and, even worse, instructed her staffer to cover them up and forward her that document via a fax machine vulnerable to spies. Clinton’s “gross negligence” may have violated the federal Espionage Act, 18 U.S. Code § 793."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[ecduzitgood]

Originally Posted by spence

We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She said to fax it, but you probably know better than Hillary what she said...oops I mean what she said in her email. Almost seems as though you hacked her emails also.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

We've discussed this. The request was for unclassified talking points contained within a document on the classified system. That on its on is no indication of wrongdoing by anyone. I'd note the requested information was never even sent via email.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

From what the State Department has said you will find unclassified information on the classified system and that doesn't mean it's illegal to talk about it.

Then again, the State Department review says the incident reported never happened regardless.

So I guess we should hold Clinton to a standard where she's liable for retroactive classification and emails that weren't even ever sent. Nice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

From what the State Department has said you will find unclassified information on the classified system and that doesn't mean it's illegal to talk about it.

Then again, the State Department review says the incident reported never happened regardless.

So I guess we should hold Clinton to a standard where she's liable for retroactive classification and emails that weren't even ever sent. Nice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You will find unclassified on a classified system......but once it gets put on the classified system.....it is not allowed to leave without approval.....and Hillary is not the person allowed to provide that approval

I expect to hold Hillary to the same standards that everybody is held to who deals with classified material.....she's not exempt from proper security practices
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Newsflash......if it's on a classified system...it's a classified document. Until it has been OK'd for release from said system.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

My bad I guess.....I should have said it is "Considered" a classified document.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

My bad I guess.....I should have said it is "Considered" a classified document.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

My understanding is they were trying to use a secure fax to transmit unclassified talking points.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device