|
[QUOTE=PaulS;1060065]Jim,
Here is an excert from the editorial
"Americans have known about many of these acts for years, but the 524-page executive summary of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report erases any lingering doubt about their depravity and illegality: In addition to new revelations of sadistic tactics like “rectal feeding,” scores of detainees were waterboarded, hung by their wrists, confined in coffins, sleep-deprived, threatened with death or brutally beaten. In November 2002, one detainee who was chained to a concrete floor died of “suspected hypothermia.”
These are, simply, crimes. They are prohibited by federal law, which defines torture as the intentional infliction of “severe physical or mental pain or suffering.” They are also banned by the Convention Against Torture, the international treaty that the United States ratified in 1994 and that requires prosecution of any acts of torture.
So it is no wonder that today’s blinkered apologists are desperate to call these acts anything but torture, which they clearly were. As the report reveals, these claims fail for a simple reason: C.I.A. officials admitted at the time that what they intended to do was illegal.
In July 2002, C.I.A. lawyers told the Justice Department that the agency needed to use “more aggressive methods” of interrogation that would “otherwise be prohibited by the torture statute.” They asked the department to promise not to prosecute those who used these methods. When the department refused, they shopped around for the answer they wanted. They got it from the ideologically driven lawyers in the Office of Legal Counsel, who wrote memos fabricating a legal foundation for the methods. Government officials now rely on the memos as proof that they sought and received legal clearance for their actions. But the report changes the game: We now know that this reliance was not made in good faith."
There have been numerous (how many?) investigations in Bengazi that have failed to find anything but we keep hearing that "what harm can 1 more investigation do"
Why not look and see if the torture violated federal law?
From that "fringe" comment I don't think you realize how many pulitzers the NYT has. I believe that they have more Pulizers than any other news
"I don't think you realize how many pulitzers the NYT has. "
What you don't realize is that winning a Pulitzer doesn't make you mainstream. That;s liberal elitists patting each other on the back, big whoop...
So why hasn't Obama charged them with a crime?
|
Threaded Mode