Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I love it "militant activists" 
One of the groups that wanted to march was comprised of gay veterans. Yea, really...
It's not about sexuality it's about identity. You seem to have this characterization about gay people like they're all running around in ass-less PVC chaps throwing condoms at little kids.
Perhaps if you had to spend most of your life hiding who you really were you'd think differently.
-spence |
"One of the groups that wanted to march was comprised of gay veterans.
Then I have good news for them, they could have marched. I giuess you didn't read the original post. Anyone can march, no one is excluded because of sexuality. They just can't march under a gay banner, as a St Patricks Day parade is not about affirming your personal sexuality.
If you think "militant" is inaccurate, tell that to the Christian business owners who are being persecuted, simply for wanting to act in accordance with their beliefs.
I have great empathy for gays, and I recognize their predicament. But if a St Patricks Day parade asks everyone, including both homosexuaks and heterosexuals, to leave the sexual identity out of it for a couple of hours, then no one is being discriminated against. If I can't hold a sign saying "hooray for heterosexuals", and gays can't hold their own banner, how in God's name is that discriminatory? We're all being treated exactly the same way. A St Patricks Day parade is not a celebration of anyone's sexual identity.
The parade asked
all marchers to leave their sexual identities out of it. Only one group had a problem with that.
My "characterization" is that they can't let this one facet of their identity on hold for an hour. That's militant, just like Al Sharpton can't stop seeing racism everywhere he looks. It's tiresome, and it hurts the cause in the long run.
The ironic thing is, St Patrick is celebrated specificlly for his tolerance and acceptance.
Threaded Mode