|
Fair trial yes, its in our constitution i dont disagree with that. But him getting off is what worries me the most. These days people take reasonable doubt to a new level. It is illegal for the cops and percution to plant or use fake evidence to make a case, but it is legal to use irrelevant evidence to caue doubt in the minds of the jurors. It must be a unanimus decision so one person doubting the man killing his wife and baby can set him free.
This is the exact reason they are placing the fathers DNA on the gun. So Neil's DNA and his dad's is on the gun, along with blood from the mother on the muzzle. Now the father has the alliby that he was at home or with someone, but Neil was "running errands" and has no recipts from any stores that can give his excuse and validity.
This is where we need someone like the Boondock Saints making sure these people dont walk the streets even if they are found not guilty in the court of law, and everything points to them doing the crime.
|
Threaded Mode