Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Yes Jim seems the things they want to control tend to involve individual freedoms and not to expand them but to limit them .. unless it’s a gun
And all those nurse firemen and police who didn’t get the shot . And I know a few they had a choice the same choice you find acceptable with women who want an abortion
MOVE to a state that allows it ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"the things they want to control tend to involve individual freedoms and not to expand them but to limit them"
Usually to prevent innocent people from being hurt. And if Roe gets overturned, abortion only gets banned if people in a state want it that way. Again, that's democracy.
"unless it’s a gun"
I'm not anyone's idea of a gun guy. But unlike abortion, it's explicitly in the constitution.
"MOVE to a state that allows it .."
Why would one have to move to a pro-choice state, to get an abortion?
When I complain about the cost of living in CT, at some point every single liberal suggests I move to a state I like better. Again, I'm just using your logic.
You're not holding any cards here. None.
The left needs to come up with something besides fear-mongering, before the midterms.
How's the stock market doing?
Threaded Mode