Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
cen·sorship
/ˈsensərSHip/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security.
what happen doesn't even meet how censorship is defined
1) no one suppressed him he was free to publish it no one stopped him
2) a private company is not required to run stories of any of its employees
3) being on Trucker Carlson show support claim 1 and 2
Detbuch who spoon feeds you your outrage ?
|
The only censorship I mentioned was
editorial censorship.
From WAPO:
In a lengthy note published on Substack, Greenwald said the publication refused to publish the piece, “in violation of my contractual right of editorial freedom,” unless he removed “all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all New-York-based Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression.”
The Intercept did not publish his article because it said he needed to support his claims with evidence. But he had a "contractual right of editorial freedom." So, because of an editorial disagreement, Greenwald's article was not published. Or, as Greenwald stated, it was "suppressed" which is a form of censorship as you defined it--"the suppression or prohibition of any parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered obscene, politically unacceptable, or a threat to security."
Threaded Mode