if trump wins in november, here’s why

[Jim in CT]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-do...li-rick-wilson

Imagine for a second, if a bunch of silver-haired white men on fox news, started talking like a bunch of crack whores from Chicago, demanding more welfare from the democrats, bragging about how
many chill-uns they gots from how
many different gang bangers. and bragging about mooching off da gubmint, not needing no ejumication, wondering why cracker cops are always bothering them, cuz they dindu nuffin.

what would happen, if that took place on fox news? what would
the reaction be? For sure a lot more people would
have seen it, than saw this on CNN.

Trump responded by making fun of Lemons dismal ratings.

This is why he won in 2016, because people had enough of being made fun of, and embraced the first republican who would swing back on their behalf.

[wdmso]

Don Lemon faced intense backlash from who? fox news Trump ,please

its so much worse than calling Americans Traitors sympathizers enemy of the people her are some others FYI not one FOX host or show Has a nickname by Trump

Mr. Tough Guy[29] John R. Bolton former U.S. national security advisor and United States ambassador to the United Nations

what he calls himself
Mr. Brexit[10]
Your Favorite President King of Debt
Tariff Man President T. / President Trump The Chosen One

Fake ABC News[183] ABC News News network
Clinton News Network[184] CNN News channel (Cable News Network)
Fake News CNN[185][k]
Very Fake News[186][k]
Low ratings CNN[86]
Democrat Party[187][l] Democratic Party Major U.S. political party
D.C. Wolves[188]
Opposition Party[189]
Radical Left Democrats[190]
Do nothings / Do Nothing Democrat Savages[191]
Animals[192] MS-13 International criminal gang active primarily in North America
Slicers[193]
Commiecast MSNBC[194] MSNBC American pay television network
MSDNC[71]
Fake News MSDNC[195]
Liberal Fake News NBC[196][k] NBC News News network
Failing New York Times[1] The New York Times Newspaper
Fake News New York Times[197][k]
Corrupt New York Times[198]
Old Grey Lady[199][m]
Amazon Washington Post[200] The Washington Post Newspaper
Fake News Washington Post[201][k]
Pathetic and dishonest Weekly Standard[202] Weekly Standard
Deface the Nation[203] Face the Nation A weekly talk show on CBS
Meet the Depressed[204] Meet the Press A Morning talk show on NBC
Meet the Corrupt Press[205]
Morning Psycho (Joe)[206] Morning Joe A Morning news and talk show MSNBC
Obama Judges[164] /
So-called judge[165] Federal judges of the United States who have ruled against Trump
Crazy Jim Acosta[121] Jim Acosta CNN chief White House correspondent, former CNN national political correspondent
Sloppy Steve[122] Steve Bannon 2016 Trump campaign CEO, former Trump administration White House chief strategist, executive chairman of Breitbart News
Wacky Glenn Beck[1] Glenn Beck Talk show host
Irrelevant Glenn Beck[123]
Failing Glenn Beck[124]
No Talent Samantha Bee[125] Samantha Bee Comedian, host of Full Frontal with Samantha Bee
Dopey CNN Flunky[126] Paul Begala American political consultant and political commentator, former political adviser to President Bill Clinton
Sloppy Carl Bernstein[127] Carl Bernstein Former Washington Post journalist, co-author of initial reporting on the Watergate scandal
Tom "marbles in his mouth" Brokaw[128] Tom Brokaw American television journalist and author
Dope Frank Bruni[129] Frank Bruni Journalist and writer for The New York Times
Dumb as a Rock Mika[1] Mika Brzezinski Co-host of Morning Joe
Low I.Q. Crazy Mika[130]
Dopey Graydon Carter[131][132] Graydon Carter Canadian journalist who served as the editor of Vanity Fair from 1992 until 2017
Dummy Graydon Carter[133]
Sissy Graydon Carter[134]
Sleepy Graydon Carter[135]
Sloppy Graydon Carter[136]
The Guy on CBS[137] Stephen Colbert Host of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert
Wacky nut job[138] Ann Coulter American conservative commentator and author
Fredo[139] Chris Cuomo Anchor, Cuomo Prime Time
Little Donny Deutsch[140] Donny Deutsch Talk show host
Crazy Maureen Dowd[141] Maureen Dowd Author and columnist for The New York Times
The Chin[142] Thomas Friedman Political commentator and columnist for The New York Times
Crooked H Flunkie[143] Maggie Haberman White House correspondent for The New York Times and CNN political analyst
Crazy Megyn[1] Megyn Kelly Former Fox News anchor, former NBC News anchor/personality
Sour Lemon[144] Don Lemon CNN news anchor
The Dumbest Man on Television[145]
Sloppy Michael Moore[146][h] Michael Moore American documentary filmmaker, activist and author
Mr. Kurd[147] Rahim Rashidi Kurdish reporter for Kurdistan TV
Mr. Off the Record[148] Philip Rucker Reporter for The Washington Post
Psycho Joe[1] / Morning Psycho[149] Joe Scarborough Co-host of Morning Joe
Little George[150][57] George Stephanopoulos Chief anchor and chief political correspondent of ABC News, former White House Communications Director and senior advisor to President Bill Clinton
Little Wise Guy[151]
Dopey Sugar[152] Alan Sugar British businessman and host of The Apprentice
Sleepy Eyes[1][153]/Sleepyeyes[154] Chuck Todd Moderator of Meet the Press
Little Katy[155] Katy Tur Correspondent for NBC News
Little Jeff Zucker[1] Jeff Zucker President of CNN Worldwide
Dopey Mort Zuckerman[156] Mortimer Zuckerman

[Jim in CT]

Again, Wayne, your political agenda prevents you from just saying, "CNN should do better". You cannot just say that, you just can't. Because your side can never, ever be in the wrong.

[Jim in CT]

Wayne, the CNN panel wasn't attacking Trump. They were making fun of people who voted for Trump. Do you understand the difference?

You're justifying what CNN did, by pointing out (correctly, no one is arguing with you) that Trump is a vindictive jerk.

Bill Clinton was a serial abuser of women. Does that give me the right to make fun of everyone who voted for him? No, because voting for a president, isn't an endorsement of everything that president has ever said or done.

Obama admitted to using cocaine earlier in his life. I've never seen a Foxnews panel suggest that everyone who voted for Obama is a crackhead.

I cannot stand the way Trump acts, and I can't begin to fathom how someone can be so arrogant, entitled, and hedonistic. However, I am convinced that the country is better off, than we would be if Hilary had won. That's why I voted for him. Doesn't make me a toothless cracker from Appalachia, any more than voting for Obama makes you a gangbanger who wears his pants down by his knees and spends all day smoking crack and cashing welfare checks and making babes you'll never see.

[Sea Dangles]

Good post
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Again, Wayne, your political agenda prevents you from just saying, "CNN should do better". You cannot just say that, you just can't. Because your side can never, ever be in the wrong.

No agenda when your Man insults people 10000 times to CNN lemon show 1

you expect equal outrage ??? with this gotcha but when the evidence of name calling is in Black and white you say I have an agenda, yes I do to point out the Hypocrisy the dems name calling will lose the election

but Trump's name calling is a formulated plan to troll Dems into unreasonable reponses , and is genius ( you have basically said this over and over)

PS who again are these giving this intense backlash for mocking Trump supporters as "credulous boomer rubes," GOP strategist roasts Pompeo's response to NPR incident seem you missed the point this was about Pompeo

So Mike Pompeo being asked tough questions from a reporter then presenting this reporter a map asking if she even knows where ukraine is, calling her a liar (but not saying what she lied about) and barred her who has covered the State Department for nearly two decades,” from his plane...

This doesn't outrage you .. the below does


credulous : showing too great a readiness to believe things. Boomer : short for baby boomer RUBE: a country bumpkin.

From breitbart
CNN Segment Ridicules Trump Supporters as Illiterate ‘Rubes’ because Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stood up for himself against the welfare queens over at NPR. Pompeo asked one of the welfare queen’s fake reporters if she could find Ukraine on a map, and this is where our story begins…

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

but Trump's name calling is a formulated plan to troll Dems into unreasonable reponses , and is genius ( you have basically sad this over and over)

Problem with that statement, is that the democrats started labeling everyone who disagrees with them as ignorant bigots, before Trump came along. Trump won because republicans were tired of being insulted all the time. That frustration didn't begin during Trumps candidacy.

You're making it up as you go along, and doing a poor job of it.

Trump is indeed a genius at getting democrats to humiliate themselves. But the willingness of democrats to trash everyone who disagrees with them as barefoot illiterate racists, started long before Trump. Trump was the first to tell these people to go ---- themselves, and that's why he won.

[FishermanTim]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

.....Trump is indeed a genius at getting democrats to humiliate themselves....

That wasn't too difficult when they embarrass themselves pretty much every time they open their mouths.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by FishermanTim

That wasn't too difficult when they embarrass themselves pretty much every time they open their mouths.

True, but he has gotten them to take it to new heights. Defending MS-13, celebrating abortions in the 9th month, comparing Soleimani to Mike Pence, embracing full-blown socialism..

[Pete F.]

I watched the CNN clip and briefly felt some empathy for those mocked and insulted (including some of my family). But then I remembered: kids in cages, poisoned environment, the Middle East, Bully-in-Chief, election cheat, and Russian tool. Have at 'em, Rick Wilson. Respect is earned.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

I watched the CNN clip and briefly felt some empathy for those mocked and insulted (including some of my family). But then I remembered: kids in cages,

Did you remember, who constructed the cages and first used them to house children who were separated from their families?

You broke your brain.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

I watched the CNN clip and briefly felt some empathy for those mocked and insulted (including some of my family). But then I remembered: kids in cages, poisoned environment, the Middle East, Bully-in-Chief, election cheat, and Russian tool. Have at 'em, Rick Wilson. Respect is earned.

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Did you remember, who constructed the cages and first used them to house children who were separated from their families?

You broke your brain.

As usual, you only remember the party line.

Only one President has ever implemented a zero tolerance policy, and he is still doing it.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order last June ostensibly ending zero tolerance and family separations at the border and promising to reunite almost 3,000 children with their parents. Yet relying largely on a technical exception, at least 700 more families have been separated since then, and at least five children have died.

In many cases, the separations since then have continued under the guise of fitting into a narrow exception to the order — that the parent poses a danger to the child, or has a serious criminal record or gang affiliation. (The exception can also be invoked if the parent is sick, or when an aunt, uncle or sibling is accompanying the child.)

“The government is trying to drive a truck through what was supposed to be a very narrow exception,” notes Lee Gelernt of the American Civil Liberties Union, who believes that the number of separated families will be more than 1,000 by the end of this summer.

Advocates, however, argue that many children are being separated from their parents for minor crimes or questionable, unverified accusations of gang affiliation, neither of which would be allowed to occur to American parents under U.S. law. And so despite the end of the zero tolerance policy, children have continued to be separated from parents only charged with the so-called crime of entering the country illegally, according to the government’s own data released to the Houston Chronicle.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

As usual, you only remember the party line.

Only one President has ever implemented a zero tolerance policy, and he is still doing it.

President Donald Trump signed an executive order last June ostensibly ending zero tolerance and family separations at the border and promising to reunite almost 3,000 children with their parents. Yet relying largely on a technical exception, at least 700 more families have been separated since then, and at least five children have died.

In many cases, the separations since then have continued under the guise of fitting into a narrow exception to the order — that the parent poses a danger to the child, or has a serious criminal record or gang affiliation. (The exception can also be invoked if the parent is sick, or when an aunt, uncle or sibling is accompanying the child.)

“The government is trying to drive a truck through what was supposed to be a very narrow exception,” notes Lee Gelernt of the American Civil Liberties Union, who believes that the number of separated families will be more than 1,000 by the end of this summer.

Advocates, however, argue that many children are being separated from their parents for minor crimes or questionable, unverified accusations of gang affiliation, neither of which would be allowed to occur to American parents under U.S. law. And so despite the end of the zero tolerance policy, children have continued to be separated from parents only charged with the so-called crime of entering the country illegally, according to the government’s own data released to the Houston Chronicle.

No no no, you said kids in cages was bad.

Now, you're saying that putting a certain number of kids in cages is OK, but once you exceed that number in cages, it's immoral. And by a stunning coincidence, the number that Obama put in cages, was below the threshold for what's acceptable to you.

Pete, we get it.

liberal=good
conservative=bad

We get it, OK?

It's a joke. Talking to you and Wayne and Spence, is an absolute joke.

Obama's former director of ICE, who has become a conservative hero lately, testified before Congress that the law essentially forces ICE to do what they're doing. THis man testified that he also agrees we need changes, but Congress needs to change the law, rather than asking ICE not to follow the law. When he testified to this, NONE of the democrats on the committee said he was wrong. I have no idea if he's right or wrong, but I haven't heard anyone on the left say he's wrong.

But let's be honest. Trump did not begin the policy of separating kids from families and outing them in cages. Obama did. AND NOBODY GAVE A DAMN. And NOBODY buys your argument that it's OK to put as many kids in cages as Obama did, but wrong when you do it as often as Trump did it. If it's wrong for any one child, it's wrong for all.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

No no no, you said kids in cages was bad.

Now, you're saying that putting a certain number of kids in cages is OK, but once you exceed that number in cages, it's immoral. And by a stunning coincidence, the number that Obama put in cages, was below the threshold for what's acceptable to you.

Pete, we get it.

liberal=good
conservative=bad

We get it, OK?

It's a joke. Talking to you and Wayne and Spence, is an absolute joke.

Obama's former director of ICE, who has become a conservative hero lately, testified before Congress that the law essentially forces ICE to do what they're doing. THis man testified that he also agrees we need changes, but Congress needs to change the law, rather than asking ICE not to follow the law. When he testified to this, NONE of the democrats on the committee said he was wrong. I have no idea if he's right or wrong, but I haven't heard anyone on the left say he's wrong.

But let's be honest. Trump did not begin the policy of separating kids from families and outing them in cages. Obama did. AND NOBODY GAVE A DAMN. And NOBODY buys your argument that it's OK to put as many kids in cages as Obama did, but wrong when you do it as often as Trump did it. If it's wrong for any one child, it's wrong for all.

You're not being honest.

Neither Bush or Obama made it policy to seperate ALL children from their parents, Floridaman did.

As the chief administrator you do get to make some policy choices, some people make wise ones, others abuse the weak.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You're not being honest.

Neither Bush or Obama made it policy to seperate ALL children from their parents, Floridaman did.

As the chief administrator you do get to make some policy choices, some people make wise ones, others abuse the weak.

can you be clear? it was ok when obama did it, but immoral for
trump to expand on it. That’s your position?

Somehow it was less traumatic for the kids obama caged, than it was for the ones Trump did?

Or are you saying that the kids Ibama caged, deserves it somehow?

Why was it ok when obama
did it, but bad when Trump did it? please be specific.

And if the ICE official has the authority to unilaterally decide to do things differently, it’s interesting that none of the democrats on the committee said that to him, yet you know it to be true.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

can you be clear? it was ok when obama did it, but immoral for
trump to expand on it. That’s your position?

Somehow it was less traumatic for the kids obama caged, than it was for the ones Trump did?

Or are you saying that the kids Ibama caged, deserves it somehow?

Why was it ok when obama
did it, but bad when Trump did it? please be specific.

And if the ICE official has the authority to unilaterally decide to do things differently, it’s interesting that none of the democrats on the committee said that to him, yet you know it to be true.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The ICE official did not set policy, he carried it out.

If you want to claim that laws have to be enforced, make sure and tell the officer that the next time you get stopped for speeding. He has no choice but to give you a ticket! And get every mile over the limit.

The policy of the Floridaman maladministration was and seems to still be to separate all children from their parents.

The Bush and Obama administrations made the conscious choice to separate as few as possible. In some cases this needs to happen, but not the maximum possible. You forget the detail that border traffic was much higher in those years, till it was reduced by half under Obama, more than double what it was when Floridaman took office.
That is one thing Floridaman has not been able to continue, it is now back up to where it was.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

The ICE official did not set policy, he carried it out.

If you want to claim that laws have to be enforced, make sure and tell the officer that the next time you get stopped for speeding. He has no choice but to give you a ticket! And get every mile over the limit.

The policy of the Floridaman maladministration was and seems to still be to separate all children from their parents.

The Bush and Obama administrations made the conscious choice to separate as few as possible. In some cases this needs to happen, but not the maximum possible. You forget the detail that border traffic was much higher in those years, till it was reduced by half under Obama, more than double what it was when Floridaman took office.
That is one thing Floridaman has not been able to continue, it is now back up to where it was.

Pete, you dodged on the issue of
kids in cages. How come?

When i get a warning for speeding, that’s not the officer disregarding the law. if he ignored my speeding, that’s disregarding the law. cops very explicitly, are allowed to use their judgment in determining the punishment for
my breaking the law. A warning is a punishment.

You’re really, really having a bad day. Go read my post about Feinstein ( Feinstein!!!) leaning towards acquittal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

I watched the CNN clip and briefly felt some empathy for those mocked and insulted (including some of my family). But then I remembered: poisoned environment, the Middle East, Bully-in-Chief, election cheat, and Russian tool. Have at 'em, Rick Wilson. Respect is earned.

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Pete, you dodged on the issue of
kids in cages. How come?

When i get a warning for speeding, that’s not the officer disregarding the law. if he ignored my speeding, that’s disregarding the law. cops very explicitly, are allowed to use their judgment in determining the punishment for
my breaking the law. A warning is a punishment.

You’re really, really having a bad day. Go read my post about Feinstein ( Feinstein!!!) leaning towards acquittal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If you think cages are so horrible, why don't you complain about them?

But then I rememberedoisoned environment, the Middle East, Bully-in-Chief, election cheat, and Russian tool.

[Ian]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-do...li-rick-wilson

Imagine for a second, if a bunch of silver-haired white men on fox news, started talking like a bunch of crack whores from Chicago, demanding more welfare from the democrats, bragging about how
many chill-uns they gots from how
many different gang bangers. and bragging about mooching off da gubmint, not needing no ejumication, wondering why cracker cops are always bothering them, cuz they dindu nuffin.

what would happen, if that took place on fox news? what would
the reaction be? For sure a lot more people would
have seen it, than saw this on CNN.

Trump responded by making fun of Lemons dismal ratings.

This is why he won in 2016, because people had enough of being made fun of, and embraced the first republican who would swing back on their behalf.

Are you insinuating that all crack whores in Chicago are black?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Ian

Are you insinuating that all crack whores in Chicago are black?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I’m really concerned Jim got really excited writing that post.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by Ian

Are you insinuating that all crack whores in Chicago are black?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does not come close to implying what you want to see. Go bait another trap.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by spence

I’m really concerned Jim got really excited writing that post.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jeff you really need to check yourself before you really wreck yourself.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Jeff you really need to check yourself before you really wreck yourself.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

another stable genius
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Ian

Are you insinuating that all crack whores in Chicago are black?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

nope. and neither is everyone who voted for trump, an ignoramus who speaks with a southern drawl. What i proposed, is the exact right wing equivalent of what CNN did.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I’m really concerned Jim got really excited writing that post.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

excited no. but proud. it was funny and spot on.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device