Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
And here it is again Jim’s logic
if they are not crimes what’s the problem
Jim give up . You defend this clown right off the bat. But know since you committed yourself to his cause
You decide to do what you always do try to make some false equivalences. And in double down because you can’t win the argument.
And the only argument I made was if his lies were proven truth would Republicans make him resign?
And it’s looking like they won’t hopefully they’ll come to their senses
But now they are proving that they are not the party of integrity, honesty, truthfulness they’re only interested in keeping his seat at any cost.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Wayne, since Blumenthal's lie is actually against the law, then on what basis could you conclude that Santos' lies are worse? Other than the fact that Santos is a republican, that is...
"false equivalences"
Wayne, no two events are exactly alike in every single detail. That doesn't mean they aren't somewhat comparable. Every single time yoru hypocrisy is shown, you cry about "false equivalence", yet you never, ever specify why the equivalence is false. Never. I'm giving you a chance to do that here. Why is Blumenthal's lie not worse that Santos'?
They passed a law to criminalize what Blumenthal did. SO again, please tell us why his lie is more benign than Santos'?
I'll wait.