Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
how do you know that judge is on the dole? just by saying it?
Really Jim now sarcasm alludes you?
Of course you don’t see an issue with 50% of cases get sent to his desk from Religious zealots.
Who see how he rules not by the bill of rights that you quote as if to grant him an excuse. He rulings seem to always involve anti government religious overtones ..
Seem this guy would rule against any contraception agreeing it promotes un married Sex
But these religious nuts who feel anti hiv meds is promoting gay sex
Have no issues paying for others viagra ..
Not sure how a business offering health insurance can list what treatments are acceptable
Jim as expected sees discrimination as a religious right and freedom..
This is the new religion in the Right in America.. don’t like something and then scream religious rights
And some judges and the SJC will agree with them because their allegiance is to god before the nation or its laws
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"Not sure how a business offering health insurance can list what treatments are acceptable"
No kidding. Because you only care about the Bill Of Rights, when it's the rights of liberals being discussed. Americans can not be forced to abandon their religious beliefs at work. That's how. The Bill doesn't specify that you have to agree with the context in which someone is asserting those rights.
I'm not saying I agree with the stance those Christians are taking. I just agree the Bill Of Rights gives them that right. If I owned a business that provided health insurance, I'd absolutely want to cover HIV treatment, but not recreational birth control and not gender transition treatments. You want it, you buy it. Leave me out of it.