Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Given the number of guns already in the system most of these actions are a longer-term value proposition. If someone from Chicago can drive to a gun show in Texas and load up on handguns without a background check the local laws are never going be effective aside from perhaps increased penalties.
Yes, gang violence is a big issue but the easy availability of illegal guns is a major contributor to that violence. I read the ATF believes a majority of them come from only 8% of dealers but without good data and tracking they're hamstrung to clamp down.
It seems like a solid majority want universal background checks...even NRA membership. It's a piece of the puzzle, not the entire solution.
I had to get fingerprinted for my TSAPreCheck, I believe you have to get fingerprinted for a CCW, I've never owned a car that the Government wasn't aware of the VIN number.
The idea that creating a Federal database is going to make it easier for the Government to confiscate your weapons is just paranoid fearmongering to keep the NRA executives in power.
|
"Given the number of guns already in the system most of these actions are a longer-term value proposition"
Agreed. Those guns in circulation will be there for 100 years. Obama's regs will have no real effectr.
Spence, if someone with a bad background decides they want to kill someone, do you really believe these regs will stop him? There are all kinds of ways for people who would fail background checks, to get guns.
"The idea that creating a Federal database is going to make it easier for the Government to confiscate your weapons is just paranoid "
Agreed on that.
This is such a small thing, in terms of making us safer. The effect on crime rates will barely be a rounding error.