[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

of course it's about you ..and your twisted fantasys and it has nothing to do with the constitution

The Tim Pool video is not my fantasy, neither twisted or right on. It exists in real time and space.

And your latest You tube mouthpiece High School school is playing you like a fiddle the man's only conviction is to play to whatever audience will send him money

I don't know what a you tube mouthpiece High School school is. If you're referring to Tim Pool, how am I being played by posting a clip from one of his podcasts--if you think it is fraudulent, please inform me how. I've seen a few of his shows, and it appears to me that he has several convictions, as well as doubts and questions. And, yes, like all journalists, or workers of any type, they need to be paid for their work.

I believe that the NYT, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC. Slate, The Guardian, The Atlantic, Salon, etc., etc., all require an audiance to survive. Are they playing to their audience, or does their audience select them because of their content?

You assume Tim Pool is faking it and has no real convictions.
How have you come to that? Actually watching or reading his stuff?
Or just accepting characterizations of him by those who don't like him?

he goes from supporting occupy wall street to Sweden to investigate claims of "no-go zones" then In July 2019, Pool participated in a White House event hosting internet personalities who President Trump characterized as unfairly targeted for their conservative views

Yes, he used to be more of a leftist, by conviction, and has drifted more to some "center" (I don't believe there is an actual political "center"). From what he has said, he has done so because of weird, authoritarian, radical turns that the Dems have taken. Other noted journalists and commentators who came from the left, like Glen Greenwald, Bill Maher, Matt Taibbi, Aaron Mate, Jimmy Dore, among others, have been regularly criticizing the Dems for their radical wokeness, race-baiting, inverting the meaning of words, and censorious inclinations--and so, in turn, they have been criticized by leftists to the point of calling them right wingers, even "far right"--which is ridiculous.

So, if Pool interviews "conservatives" or criticizes Democrats (when they deserve it), then, in your eyes, he's a sell-out?

andElection Integrity Partnership (EIP) said that Pool was a "superspreader" of claims surrounding voter fraud before and after the 2020 United States presidential election

"Election Integrity" sounds so nice and assuring.
But like much inverted language from the left, the "integrity" is elusive. It rather shifts into its opposite--calculated bias:

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2022/...sites-in-2020/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...eet-responses/

https://historyheist.com/wickedpedia...y-partnership/

https://www.thefire.org/news/one-wei...xing-elections

https://trendingpolitics.com/biden-r...ocuments-knab/



As of 2019 and 2020, Pool's audience was largely right-wing.

How dare they!!! Sort of like Fox News. Oh, yeah, sort of like just about all news outlets, left or right--the audience being largely those who agree with them. SO WHAT?!!

detbuch your just a flea Jumping from dog to dog as long as they sing your tune.. Just let it soak in you use Youtube video and try to repackage factual source in a comical attempt legitimize to your arguments ....

Unlike you, I read the posts of those with whom I disagree. I don't make assumptions, accusations, smears and characterizations until I do read them, then I critique the words and thoughts in them. It's like that scientific method of falsifying presented in the YouTube video you posted which you either didn't understand or are unable or unwilling to practice, but rather prefer to proclaim all manner of silly assumptions from the hole in the sand that you stick your head into.

there's a name for it Illusory truth effect

The illusory truth effect is the tendency to believe false information to be correct after repeated exposure.

Yes, that's the illusory comfort that you seem to get by dismissing and disparaging posts you don't read, and instead depend on false information that is repeated by your, how did you put it--your "go to" sources--that tell you, over and over, what you want to hear.