Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Actually, we don't really know what the statistics say because the NRA doesn't want any statistics to be gathered.
When the CDC was studying this in the 1990's they found that firearms in the household made it 300 times more likely to be shot and 5 times more likely a gun death by suicide.
Comparing gun law in Chicago to North Dakota makes no sense at all. It's not like we have borders, or equal demographics.
|
"Actually, we don't really know what the statistics say because the NRA doesn't want any statistics to be gathered."
Actually, we do know what the statistics say, because they are released by the FBI. According to those statistics, gun ownership is much higher in the Dakotas than it is in Chicago and DC, yet gun crimes are much lower there. You are entitled to your own opinions, you are not entitled to your own facts. I posted the FBI states in an earlier post, and they are not ambiguous.
"Comparing gun law in Chicago to North Dakota makes no sense at all. It's not like we have borders"
Not gun law. Gun ownership. Gun ownership is low in Chicago, and they have 50 shootings a weekend now. The fact that we have open borders suggests what?
"or equal demographics"
You almost stumbled onto the truth there. It's not gun ownership that determines gun violence rates. It's the character of the people who own the guns.