Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The majority of Government jobs are transactional.
the majority are unnecessary and we should reduce the number of government transactions
These are different scenarios.
not really, both are examples of companies that with much government fanfare sought to "innovate" through government "encouragement" thinking that "innovation" would result in a successful business venture despite the lack of demand in one case and any ability to compete in the other....all hype....then.... all disappointment.....Like Obama
As usual you're pretty much missing the point completely. This isn't a situation where the government is dictating anything, just helping to defray a little risk as an incentive.
-spence
|
this is a situation where Obama has nothing left to regurgitate so he thinks that this will be some solution to the lack of hiring and later he can complain that companies didn't take advantage of his benevolence when they don't take advantage of what is actually a really bad idea...
this is Obama's version of 100,000 cops on the streets
Kudlow - Businesses like to look ahead at least three to five years for their employment planning. And they’re already worried about the tax and regulatory mandate costs of Obamacare, which has become a great deterrent to job creation. But nobody makes clear business decisions based on temporary one-year tax cuts. That’s not the way business works.
see above
NY Times
Employers Say Jobs Plan Won’t Lead to Hiring Spur