View Single Post
Old 11-19-2010, 02:49 PM   #17
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
So what would have been the difference if its was a military court - nothing. Much of the evidence would have still been thrown out. The military tribunals act bars coerced evidence. Blame Bush.
I don't know about that...and I'm sure that this would not have happened..

"One news report suggests the verdict was a compromise to appease one juror who was holding out for an acquittal on all charges."

Review & Outlook: The Verdict on Holder - WSJ.com
scottw is offline