Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Hey mr YouTube where’s the evidence the proof the documents
All that women did was throw out suggestions and innuendos
Evidence or proof of what. She wrote a 1,000 page book. She documented the evidence for her opinions or conclusions in her book.
You seriously think that the salient and/or interesting points of such a huge book in which so much stuff is discussed can be covered in one hour if all the documents have to be presented? They could barely fit in what they did talk about in that time.
But of course you think it’s some smoking gun.
No, it is the evidence that strongly shows where we are headed, not just as Americans, but as human beings.
The only person suggesting ignorant declarations on American federal administrative shenanigans,
Is you. Seek help
|
The help is in being informed. It's in having serious discussions about it. The time for it is getting shorter. You don't seem to have a clear grasp of what "the Deep State" is. You disparage the phrase as if it were some crazy Q Anon concoction. That's why I called it the American federal administration shenanigans. The Federal Administration agencies are the deep state--the alphabet regulatory, investigative, intelligence, and military agencies. And many of their shenanigans have been well documented. Some of those shenanigans are now being exposed and documented with the release of Twitter files--to which you hide your head in the sand and dismiss as conspiracies to be ignored. That's what I referred to as your "ignorant declarations."
What Whitney Webb has meticulously done in her book is pointed to where we are heading at the direction of oligarchic coordination with government(s) in fascistic "public/private cooperation" eventually evolving into a centralized technocracy, funded/directed by so-called "cooperation" between the most powerful oligarchs and a unified global government.
I know. I know . . . that's sounds like a big, stupid, conspiracy theory. We used to "debunk" the "new world order conspiracy"--but not so much anymore. As whitney Webb said, the label "conspiracy theory" has been used ever since the JFK assassination to belittle any attempt to expose government (especially "Deep State") wrongdoing. And it has become a very successful ploy.
What she has done is compiled a ton of facts which, in the aggregate, lead to her conclusions. Conclusions (or "suggestions" as you put it) based on facts have merit and are worthy of discussion rather than off-handedly being dismissed or ridiculed.
Actual, true, documented facts are presented in her book, and for her are strong evidence for her conclusions. They are not fake evidence concocted by creating false, illegal court warrants, not accusations by the accuser or government agency that they know are false. They are not government or media misinformation. She didn't, as you say, only "throw out suggestions and innuendos." She made definitive statements of fact about various affiliations, crimes, various actions and statements and histories most of which are on public record and many that were a result of research. They were documented in her book which no one as yet has disputed. And they are the "evidence" for her conclusions.
Conjecture or conclusions based on facts are not in the same category of evidence, as the so-called "evidence" based on lies, misinformation, and suppression of speech--the type of phony "evidence" that has abundantly been paraded before us the past six years.