Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The focus of her remarks follows quite closely what the CIA was giving the State Department at the time, yet it does...
I don't see how the email to her daughter is even contradictory to anything. She just said there was an attack. There was...
|
Can you post something to support your statement that she was always relying on the latest CIA report? The CIA flip-flops dovetailed with her flip-flops? The CIA flip-flopped as many times as she did? And all those flip-flops from CIA, were timed perfectly, so that she never had to say in public that it was a planned terrorist attack? Boy, what good fortune for her.
The email to her daughter, I thought, stated that it was a pre-planned terrorist attack, which is contradictory to the theory that it ws a spontaneous reaction to the video.