Vetting refugees
So the FBI (the premier investigative agency in the world) investigated the Orlando shooter twice, and concluded that he wasn't a threat.
Yet the same federal government is telling us to relax because they are screening all the Muslim refugees who are entering the US. Imagine my relief. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I thought that Homeland Security does the vetting. either way, I understand the no confidence thing, all the more reason to support the second amendment and protect yourself because if you think our government is going to protect you from evil, you are not paying attention.
|
Quote:
|
Apples and oranges. Your question is like asking why a local pizza delivery guy should be trusted to give you a cab ride in NYC.
|
Spence, what is your solution?
|
Quote:
|
Vetting.
|
You're assuming there's a problem in need of a solution. The existing process seems to be sufficient from what I've read and the number of immigrants involved isn't that big.
Trumps running around telling people that terrorists are going to flood in which really isn't true. |
This is a situation Jeff,where just one can be too many. The possibility of many would have consequences that may have you taking more karate classes.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Yes, why everyone and why not for a period of time until a better system is
devised to use every method possible to make a safer program? |
Ha, I would also like to hear your drivel about just how that makes terrorists the victors.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
We should not accept any citizen from a country that supports terrorism as one of the rules for refusal.
What is wrong with that? Just plain common sense. |
Here's a novel idea. Let's keep them over there and we stay over here.
Holy sheet... I just solved it Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
IMO any refugee entering this country should be required sign a legal document during the vetting process giving up their rights to privacy until they become a U.S. citizen.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Taking irrational action at the border to discriminate against Islam is not only going to be ineffective it's going drive self radicalization. Newsflash, the worst mass shooting in US history appears to be a lover scorned. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...-mateen-224644 |
Quote:
Oh scorned lover.. Lmao . Is that the new "work place violence "? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
The process for refugees to come to the US is not the same as the EU either. It's much harder, takes longer and I don't believe refugees even have any say where they are sent. They are fingerprinted and have their retinas scanned. Sure there's always a possibility and we should be vigilant, but trying to sneak a terrorist into the US as a refugee is probably the most difficult path to take. |
Quote:
Btw who is " radicalizing " these US citizens? If we let our fear that radicalized Muslim legal immigrants could be the result of stricter immigration controls , then the terrorist win. No ? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
And they have to be laughing at our un-American stupidity of placing ourselves in the demographic danger of expanding the population here of those who breed like rabbits (that's not racist--rabbits are not a relevant racial, or gender, or national, or ethnic, group) while, at the same time, we do not breed at replacement level (when discounting the irrational, un-American, acceptance of millions of illegal immigrants.) Your idea of American "values" seems to contain a high degree of self flagellation . . . even of a latent suicidal tendency. That must be some new Progressive, delusional, LSD like substance politically injected into the cultural bloodstream of America. And the terrorists must be bending over with spasms of glee that we see more danger in the Muslims who are already here than in the Muslims yet to come. Somehow, some of us seem to think that those to come (if they are not already "radicalized") won't become radicalized as easily as those who are here now. And somehow those who think that way miss the obvious fact that once immigrants get here, they will become part of the ones who become citizens and are already here. That the number who who are "already here" will have grown, creating the potential of even more "radicalized" Muslims. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com