#SummaCumLiar
The Trump slam ‘Summa Cum Liar’ is trending right now on Twitter, largely in part to the man who coined it, George Conway, also known as Kellyanne Conway’s husband.
George Conway @gtconway3d I will concede him this: Wherever he goes and whatever he does, Trump will always be summa cum liar. #SummaCumLiar |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Trump’s Big Tax Cuts Did Little to Boost Economic Growth
His revisions to regulations did more, but all at a cost that history will reveal. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...conomic-growth |
Quote:
"Like I said before the Fixed it for you. By what standard is the 'American Brand' diminished worldwide? Are immigrants refusing to come here, and choosing Canada instead? Is that what all these caravans' ultimate goal is, to walk to Canada? Because our brand is diminished? If our brand can handle a guy who apologized for all of our shortcomings, it can handle a guy who thinks we're all that and a bag of chips. |
Quote:
Your declined to admit a correlation between corporate tax cuts and corporate investment. (1) did it mention the investment undertaken by companies whose CEO's said clearly, that additional investment was directly because of the tax cuts? Comcast, which owns NBC and NBC and is therefore no Trump boot licker, announced massive investments and said it was because of the tax cuts. Bloomberg might not like that, that's there problem. (2) How about increased consumer spending? Some consumer spending was triggered by tax cuts, and some corporate investments were undertaken because of consumer spending. It's pretty hard to predict what the economy would have done, had things been different. Lots of moving pieces. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This all boils down to, he beat them. he beat them at their own game - fighting dirty, lying, smearing, and insulting his opponents. He beat them at their own game, he pulverized them at their own game, by winning the election. Then to top it all off, he's making things better by many rational standards (not debt, not by refusing to build a wall for 2 years, not by praising Kim Jong Un or whatever his name is). He made them look stupid, and continues to make them look stupid. Larry Summers was Obama's top economic advisor (I think?), he said 3% growth was as realistic as the tooth fairy, then bam, Trump did it. Do you see Summers on TV, admitting Trump was right and he was wrong? Nope. Because they aren't capable of that kind of honesty. Trump did what Summers said was impossible. |
Quote:
Perhaps what he did enabled it to continue the upward movement. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This all boils down to, he beat them Again this shows how in love you are with Trump and how deep your denial runs and a typical response from the faithful ... wilfully ignoring the real reason it's happening ... all the convictions and the investigations it's called breaking the law and Trump hired them and he's responsible for their behavior ... that's what leadership is about Because they aren't capable of that kind of honesty. The Minute you and your Conservative pals Demand the same kind of honesty from the POTUS you really have zero credibility in the honesty department |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You’re not saying marital fidelity counts for Republicans are you Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You said this: "You might also note that the personal ethics that most complain about occurred before he became President. His past actions should not be used to accuse him of besmirching his present office." Ken Starr and his leaky apprentices, one of whom was Kavanaugh (had to throw that in), spent two years investigating Whitewater, which occurred prior to Clinton's election and when they could not find what they wanted, the Republicans moved on to other things, since they were out to "get" him. That was called "a witch hunt" but by the Democratic minority, not the President. Luckily for Clinton his approval rating was double what Trump's is and actually increased to 70% the week of his impeachment. That's a far cry from Trump's, which floats one side or the other of 40%. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I also said, which you did not include here, was that "if his past actions have not been continued in his role of POTUS, should they be considered the "means" he uses to get things done as President?" It is not reasonable nor logical to say that what Trump did in the past and is not doing while in office are the means or method that he uses now to do things like growing the economy. That makes no sense. So the rabbit hole of Whitewater and Vince Foster have nothing to do with what I said. They are a change of subject. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
The Dems are trying to win an election in 2020 that they know they cannot legitimately win!"
Trump already trying to discredit the next election shocking Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
You are so focused on discrediting Trump that you often cannot respond to what is actually being said, or to what the subject of a thread is. You must, for some reason (Trump hate?), inject your repetitive anti-trump rhetoric even when it has nothing to do with the conversation--except for the running anti-Trump conversation in your head. As for a correct path to determining how to look at a President, I would say, first of all, look to see how he is performing as a President. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com