Sondland putting the nail in the coffin
testifies that he’s making a “personal guess” about a quid pro who. before you slam the source, it’s a vide if him. his guess is good enough for me, by jiminy.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/61066642...#sp=show-clips |
Again ignoring a lot of very smart people .. who have years of understanding peoples intent..
This excuse since you didn't hear it directly from Trump it didn't happen is just a dishonest excuse... Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Just a little plausible deniability on Trumps part, and he's not very good at it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZWT5AeFUwE |
More Sondland testimony!!
Sondland testified about a conversation with Trump where he asked the president what he wanted from Ukraine. “And it was a very short, abrupt conversation,” the ambassador said. “He was not in a good mood. And he just said, ‘I want nothing. I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. Tell Zelensky to do the right thing.’ Something to that effect.” Pow! Right in the kisser! |
It's important to note the timing of Trump's "I want nothing..I want no quid pro quo" statement to Sondland: It occurred on September 9, the exact same day the House Intel Committee received the whistleblower's complaint....
You would have let John Gotti off also, no dirty hands for him either. Sondland with a simple but obvious point: if the meeting wasn’t tied to the investigations then…. They would have just had the meeting. It is extraordinary to hear the Republican members emphasize the absence of direct evidence for matters for which the President has blocked both testimony and documents from being turned over. |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
You and the Republican members emphasize the absence of direct evidence for matters for which the President has blocked both testimony and documents from being turned over.
|
I’m betting there is a ton of evidence in the state department records and if no crime why not release it all to clear it all up. Why not give Bolton, Mulvaney or Rudy the green light to testify, oh yeah because while Sondland probably nailed the House impeachment coffin shut, those two would shovel all the dirt on top. Trump wanted to be famous, he might not have dreamed it would be for being one of the few presidents to be impeached. I think when it’s all over, the Clintons will have Trump and Melania over for a pity party.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
And again were back to no one was told directly From Trump So it didn't happen But Rudy did but wont testify. shocking Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Sondland asks open ended question and it’s Trump who raises, by denying, quid pro quo. Like a child who blurts out I didn’t eat the cookies when parent didn’t mentions cookies.
|
Quote:
who are testifying. which smart people who testified, proved that trump ordered a quid pro quo? i missed that. fine, compel rudy to testify, he’ll probably claim attorney client confidentiality. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I’m not sure what testimony is watching.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Produce a rational explanation |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
him speaking. maybe you’re simply reading CNN headlines, which actually got demolished in real time during recent testimony. Rep Mike Turner read a CNN headline which said Sondland connected trump to the quid pro quo, Turner asked Sondland i’d he had any evidence whatsoever that trump ordered it, Sondland said no, other than his presumption. that’s the testimony i’m watching. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
You'd be better off watching Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney with that strong New York Irish cop energy as he gets Sondland to say clearly that the investigations Trump wanted would benefit Trump. |
Quote:
, so Jordon presents it as somehow Trump never wanted anything by saying see he said so clearly but leaving out the call was days after they were aware of the whistleblower complaint they tried to bury . just like read the transcript which clearly lays out Trumps intent |
Jim Jordan: “Do you know what a quid pro quo is?”
Guy appointed as an ambassador after donating $1M to Trump’s inauguration: “I do.” |
the democrat desperation is deep:kewl:
|
Quote:
The democrats didn’t want to impeach Clinton, and we literally had DNA evidence that he lied under oath. the bar has been lowered, it seems. and you’re so unbiased, you’ve stated you’ve already dismissed the Durham investigation as a partisan sham, even though it hasn’t been released. you notice any trends in how your conclusions always, with zero exceptions, align with a certain political ideology? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Impeachment does not overturn an election
It is the constitutional remedy for a President who has abused his power as Floridaman has Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
All Trump had to do to was avoid the situation He finds himself in.. by AKA acting like a Potus .. rather than a runaway train who thinks hes untouchable and cant be held accountable .. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Sure sounds like it. Do you have any talking points that haven’t been contradicted with testimony under oath? You do know Nunes Is giving the house republicans nothing right? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
democrats) are doing. i also don’t think you overturn a duly elected president, over hearsay and “presumptions”. that’s not even circumstantial evidence, which is at least evidence. as of this moment, hearsay and presumptions is all we have. Why did Sondland read a 23-page opening statement which didn’t include the words “by the way, this is all presumption, i have zero direct evidence connecting Trump to this.”? Answer, because this isn’t about facts, it’s about getting rid of a president they hate. gimme an alternative reason for excluding such a key fact from a 23 page opening statement. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com