Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   Unions stealing "occupy bostons" thunder (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=73825)

Swimmer 10-14-2011 01:00 PM

Unions stealing "occupy bostons" thunder
 
I have to agree with what some of the people protesters are doing, such as: outrageous CEO salaries and so forth, but much of what they are doing seems aimless.

I find it hard to imagine the original occupiers not having an issue with the union interlopers though. They have jobs, most with benefits, although some say like the SEIU/hotel people are underpaid. I don't know what they make so I can't say. But the Verizon people generally make good salaries, but the company is trying to cut the bennys.

I wonder how long before the clash occurs?

JohnnyD 10-14-2011 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swimmer (Post 892751)
I wonder how long before the clash occurs?

I don't think it will occur. Union works have cemented in a great scam for themselves. They push to milk the employer (or taxpayer) for all they can and then paint up an illusion like they are the little guy that's being stomped on by "the 1%." The Union workers are seen as "one of us" due to the Union's effective marketing of themselves.

Piscator 10-14-2011 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyD (Post 892758)
I don't think it will occur. Union works have cemented in a great scam for themselves. They push to milk the employer (or taxpayer) for all they can and then paint up an illusion like they are the little guy that's being stomped on by "the 1%." The Union workers are seen as "one of us" due to the Union's effective marketing of themselves.

X2......

RIJIMMY 10-14-2011 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swimmer (Post 892751)
I have to agree with what some of the people protesters are doing, such as: outrageous CEO salaries and so forth, ?

private companies, they can protest all they want. Its none of their business. dont like it, dont do business with the company. Dont like bank fees, dont do business with them, dont want student loans, dont borrow.

Think the customer has no voice? Look at Netflx over the last few months.

Piscator 10-14-2011 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY (Post 892761)
private companies, they can protest all they want. Its none of their business. dont like it, dont do business with the company. Dont like bank fees, dont do business with them, dont want student loans, dont borrow.

Think the customer has no voice? Look at Netflx over the last few months.

X2

Are we now trying to put a salary cap on a private companies CEO salary?

Chesapeake Bill 10-14-2011 01:28 PM

Funny thing is, SEIU is only two blocks from the protesters in DC. They are paying kids to protest. I was told they were offering 600 per week if you did not sleep. I was thinking of sending my boy with his Xbox, a TV, and a small generator...that would guarantee he didn't sleep and he'd have a job...do you think they take taxes out for him? LOL

Piscator 10-14-2011 01:56 PM

I heard someone was selling "Capitalism" T-shirts at the Wall Street protest for $19.99 and protestors were buying them like crazy. Perfect example of a bunch of followers having no clue what the stand for or what they are truly protesting about.

spence 10-14-2011 08:15 PM

For banks to take HUGE risks, fail miserably, get hundreds of BILLIONS in taxpayer bailouts, then recover and offer millions in bonuses to some while tens of thousands are being laid off.

This is...the American Dream.

I can't imagine why anyone would protest the American Dream.

-spence

detbuch 10-14-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 892862)
For banks to take HUGE risks, fail miserably, get hundreds of BILLIONS in taxpayer bailouts, then recover and offer millions in bonuses to some while tens of thousands are being laid off.

I thought you were for the bailout? Some disaster was supposed to happen without it? Is it the HUGE risks and the miserable failure that you object to? Then why bail them out? Why reward the miserable failure? Do the bonuses put tens of thousands out of work? The protesters not only don't like the banks, or the bailouts that you approve of, but they also don't like capitalism. They want to eliminate capitalism. To them, apparently, the essence of capitalism is the creation of a 1% which sucks the life out of the 99% simply because that is their goal. Capitalism isn't about private property ownership, private investment to promote private business, a symbiotic financial relationship with free market enterprise for them-- it is the destruction of all that. I don't think they have a clear concept of what the word means. People use "capitalism" to mean all sorts of things, good or bad. Like most "systems," it depends on who use them and to what ends that create good or bad outcomes. Capitalism, for the most part, has facilitated some of the greatest economic good. Some "miserable failures" have resulted from its misuse. I don't know, nor do I suspect many of the prostesters know, what economic/financial method they want to replace capitalism. It sounds like they want more government control--some form of socialism.

This is...the American Dream.

I can't imagine why anyone would protest the American Dream.

-spence

Wha??? How did the so-called "American Dream" get involved with all this mess? What the heck IS the American Dream? What is your idea of the American Dream? Do the protesters have the same vision of an American Dream that you do?

scottw 10-15-2011 04:58 AM

look on the bright side, the vermin defacating, urinating and leaving trash on the streets and parks of America currently, harassing businesses and police and causing mayhem encouraged by the likes of Obama, Pelosi, Michael Moore and Spence to complain that the government isn't doing enough for them are actually future democrat members of congress, state and local office holders etc....this is on the job training for these people, the only difference between these protesters(occupiers) and democrat members of congress is that the democrat members of congress have learned to pee indoors :uhuh:

UserRemoved 10-15-2011 06:08 AM

Yea they like playing footsie in the bathroom stalls too

:D
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Swimmer 10-15-2011 08:20 AM

Thanks for the replys guys. Always something to learn here.

JohnR 10-15-2011 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 892862)
For banks to take HUGE risks, fail miserably, get hundreds of BILLIONS in taxpayer bailouts, then recover and offer millions in bonuses to some while tens of thousands are being laid off.

This is...the American Dream.

I can't imagine why anyone would protest the American Dream.

-spence


You would think they could take it to DC and protest the weasels they elected - oh wait, some of them are too young to have voted before and communists can't vote - that line their pockets with money from Wall St.

Occupy hard work day in and day out for a decade or two then perhaps you will have earned a right to bitch about something other than asking some Wall St puke to pay for your Ivy League Marxist education.

Pete F. 10-15-2011 08:50 AM

The American Dream
When I was a kid in the 50s my parents bought a house.
They were in their 20s (26 and 28)
My mother was a stay at home mom.
My father worked one job. He did go to college at night but never finished his degree.
People had passbook savings accounts that made 5-1/4% and the money was loaned out by the bank in their community.
I could go on and on.
Just like when my kids say you need to be greener Dad.
When I was a kid milk and soda came in bottles, you returned them, they washed them and reused them.
Meat was wrapped in butcher paper.
I don't think you can buy a food item that is not encased in plastic today.
There was no such thing as paper towels.
We rode our bikes, came home from school and went out of the house and played with our friends till our mother called us for dinner.
Doctors made house calls, you paid them with money and you could.
If your family or neighbors were sick or had a tough time YOU helped them.


Think about how things have changed and where the American Dream has gone.
Now follow the money and see where it leads.

JohnR 10-15-2011 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 892937)
The American Dream
When I was a kid in the 50s my parents bought a house.
They were in their 20s (26 and 28)
My mother was a stay at home mom.
My father worked one job. He did go to college at night but never finished his degree.
People had passbook savings accounts that made 5-1/4% and the money was loaned out by the bank in their community.
I could go on and on.
Just like when my kids say you need to be greener Dad.
When I was a kid milk and soda came in bottles, you returned them, they washed them and reused them.
Meat was wrapped in butcher paper.
I don't think you can buy a food item that is not encased in plastic today.
There was no such thing as paper towels.
We rode our bikes, came home from school and went out of the house and played with our friends till our mother called us for dinner.
Doctors made house calls, you paid them with money and you could.
If your family or neighbors were sick or had a tough time YOU helped them.


Think about how things have changed and where the American Dream has gone.
Now follow the money and see where it leads.

This post is full of win.

Money leads to two places: Wealthy and Politicians

Now follow the POWER, where does it lead? Politicians, the Political Class, and the Wealthy

Cui Bono?

Karl F 10-15-2011 09:40 AM

Yes Pete, better days they were.. the Doc made house calls, and was paid money.. if he came in the evening, he was most likely made a drink by the old man, and mom cooked him a home made dinner... at least it worked that way in my house... back then... the doc was not buried in student loans, malpractise insurance costs, lawyers fees, only needed one secretary/bookeeper, most likley his wife, no the staff, that plauges the doctors of today.. I could rant on the other stuff too.. but will stop now..thanks for the trip down memory lane, and as the Prophet, George Carlin stated.. "You know why the call it the American Dream don't you?.. It's 'cause you have to be asleep to believe it!"

There WAS a time...however...and some of us, remember... the "Owners" can't wait for us to die off.

RIROCKHOUND 10-15-2011 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saltys (Post 892896)
Yea they like playing footsie in the bathroom stalls too

of course, Larry Craig was a republican....

So for example:

Bank of America received (and mostly paid back) 45Bil + guarantees against something outrageous like $100Bil in bad loans from TARP.

they lay off 30,000 workers... but still give 11Mil to people who did a #^&#^&#^&#^&ty job?

Bank Of America Coughs Up $11 Million To Ousted Execs - Forbes

yup. nothing is wrong with this country.

I work with local banks for all our accounts for a reason...

justplugit 10-15-2011 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 892937)
The American Dream
When I was a kid in the 50s my parents bought a house.
They were in their 20s (26 and 28)
My mother was a stay at home mom.
My father worked one job. He did go to college at night but never finished his degree.
People had passbook savings accounts that made 5-1/4% and the money was loaned out by the bank in their community.
I could go on and on.
Just like when my kids say you need to be greener Dad.
When I was a kid milk and soda came in bottles, you returned them, they washed them and reused them.
Meat was wrapped in butcher paper.
I don't think you can buy a food item that is not encased in plastic today.
There was no such thing as paper towels.
We rode our bikes, came home from school and went out of the house and played with our friends till our mother called us for dinner.
Doctors made house calls, you paid them with money and you could.
If your family or neighbors were sick or had a tough time YOU helped them.


Think about how things have changed and where the American Dream has gone.
Now follow the money and see where it leads.

Pete,thanks for the memories.

I believe the 40s and 50s were the best decades in our country's history.
It all changed in the mid 60s when Timothy Leary and his cronies became
the icons with their "turn on and drop out" hippie drug mentality.

In addition women's lib was born where they wanted
everything a man could have and do. They desrerved the equal pay and
same opportunities but left the home and began to work. Then you
had 2 incomes in a family rather than 1 and people began to live on
the 2 salaries and up grade instead of salting some away. All great till
one loses their job.

They gave their kids material things instead of their time and good values
buying them off the with material things, hence the path to greed.
Many from that generation are in power now, milking the establishment,
as usual, with the values and morals of a slug.

Just my observations and pity for those who never lived the American Dream
or have a clue what real living is all about. Their loss.
As you say, it's now" follow the money and see where it leads."

Pete F. 10-15-2011 11:26 PM

I think you have the time of change right but you are giving Timothy Leary way too much credit.
I'd look to LBJ and his "New Society" The theory behind it is well intended but the bureaucracy that was created is an unwieldy and expensive method of neighbors helping neighbors thru bureaucrats.

The creation and advancement of MBA programs where instead of working their way from the mailroom to the boardroom we created relatively instant wizards who placed no value on employees only on numbers, Great at short term solutions that we (the middle class) are now paying the price for.
Ya know I try and stay out of this forum:)

Karl F 10-16-2011 08:15 AM

a LOT of factors besides Leary, the "New Society" etc.

My Dad always blamed the introduction of Credit Cards, Shopping Centers, which morphed into "Malls", and heavy TV ads brainwashing people to spend money they didn't have with EZ credit.... I truly feel that had a lot to do with it, it killed main street in most towns, the mom and pop retailers for the most part, went out, once the big chains took hold, and the "Mall" became the destination for shoppers, people got way to used to "slapping plastic" the banks realized it was all win win for them.. and TV gave us a 9 month xmas season, and non stop ads targeted at kids(toys) and well.. I better stop now....
but it sure did work out good for banks and corporations, which we are now being told/sold, that they are people too.....

justplugit 10-16-2011 08:26 AM

You are absoluetly right,Pete, a lot of book learners
without any experience or common sense.

Speaking of which when I was in a management training program
in the early 60s one of the books we read said, "when hiring a manager
look for someone who has the character of one you would want
your children to work for. " Honesty and integrity were #1.
That thinking would be unheard of in todays business world and hence a
big part of the trouble we are in.

Don't be a stranger here Pete, great for letting go of frustrations
and having fun. :D

justplugit 10-16-2011 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl F (Post 893099)
a LOT of factors besides Leary, the "New Society" etc.

My Dad always blamed the introduction of Credit Cards, Shopping Centers, which morphed into "Malls", and heavy TV ads brainwashing people to spend money they didn't have with EZ credit.... I truly feel that had a lot to do with it, it killed main street in most towns, the mom and pop retailers for the most part, went out, once the big chains took hold, and the "Mall" became the destination for shoppers, people got way to used to "slapping plastic" the banks realized it was all win win for them.. and TV gave us a 9 month xmas season, and non stop ads targeted at kids(toys) and well.. I better stop now....
but it sure did work out good for banks and corporations, which we are now being told/sold, that they are people too.....

You and your Dad are right on, Karl.
Credit cards and the Malls were the beginning of the end.
Even had an effect on neighborliness, as you wouldn't meet
your friends at the local stores to say hello. Couldn't even have
a talk about last nights Gunsmoke show. LOL

TheSpecialist 10-16-2011 09:28 AM

Alot of people miss the bigger picture. Companies offshore production because they know if they want to raise profits without pissing off the consumer to please the investor it is the only way. They still charge the same amount of money for the product, but now have larger margins. Part of the problem is that companies are publicly traded, leading to smaller companies not to be able to compete and being bought up. FTA's are killing us, and we borrow money from the chinese to boot. When did it become alright for the CEO to make for example 364 times the amount of the average worker?

CEO-to-worker pay appears to narrow - Aug. 29, 2007

This is the 1percent they are talking about

RIJIMMY 10-16-2011 09:26 PM

people have short memories....

1995 I'm living in California, every 20-something I worked with was ditching the corporate world and off to some dot-com, making wads of cash. Every 40-50yr old with a shiny 401k was like a teen on viagra, their wimpy retirement investments were now worth BIG bucks while idiots paid over $400 a share or frekin eBay. There was no whining about the death of the american dream, NO ONE was whining. Times where good, and all these people with big nest eggs, instead of downsizing and moving to retirement homes, they bought BIGGER, more expensive homes, driving up real estate around the country. No one (except new home buyers) was whining when their homes they bought for 65K where now worth 350K.
The 50 and 60s where fine times because 10 years earlier every single country except the us was destroyed. We where the only industry. Things where simpler, but there where less people, more resources, and NO competition globally, all money came here.
time to wake up, kids in India, China, Vietnam, have computers, they study, they crave resources. All this adds up. Dont blame the rich, dont blame the wealthy. In american there is NO barrier to become wealthy, class, color, race - dont matter. Christ Jobs and Gates are freaking drop outs. Business is business, has been since the stone age. Some sat around and wished it would rain, some diverted rivers to provide for their crops. Some built pyramids, some lived in caves. The future is yours to make.
ACCOUNTABILITY

Saltheart 10-17-2011 05:32 AM

Politicians once stuck their necks out (literally) to do what they thought was right. Now they spend their time getting reelected and doing favors for people who now or in the future if they don't get elected will make them rich. They country is gasping for air because the people who run it have lost track of the difference between right and wrong. There is always an angle to rationalize how what will benefit them is actually the right thing to do.

Its a shame and its not likely to get better since the best way to get reelected in these times is to give everyone with their hand out what they are asking for. Of course they will keep voting for whoever gives them what they want. Why sould they have to earn it when their vote gets it for them for free.

Swimmer 10-17-2011 09:29 AM

Nice post Pete
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 892937)
The American Dream
When I was a kid in the 50s my parents bought a house.
They were in their 20s (26 and 28)
My mother was a stay at home mom.
My father worked one job. He did go to college at night but never finished his degree.
People had passbook savings accounts that made 5-1/4% and the money was loaned out by the bank in their community.
I could go on and on.
Just like when my kids say you need to be greener Dad.
When I was a kid milk and soda came in bottles, you returned them, they washed them and reused them.
Meat was wrapped in butcher paper.
I don't think you can buy a food item that is not encased in plastic today.
There was no such thing as paper towels.
We rode our bikes, came home from school and went out of the house and played with our friends till our mother called us for dinner.
Doctors made house calls, you paid them with money and you could.
If your family or neighbors were sick or had a tough time YOU helped them.


Think about how things have changed and where the American Dream has gone.
Now follow the money and see where it leads.


The other day a young female coastie was walking to South Station by the occupiers and many of them taunted her and then a few spit on her. Incredible rude, some of them.

So may of thier quotes surround them not having to work for what they want, and they want what they want now, or I am not going home. Guy about thirty says on TV, his parents must be proud, "they, (the man, or the conglomerate) don't have a job for me at the wages I want, so I am occupying this park until they do".

So may seem like underachievers. Like the guy who has a biochemistry degree that can get work readily working in a hospital lab, but he said that was beneath him and he only does that work when he runs out of money, unemployement I guess, meaning us.

It is going to be funny when it comes to a crashing interactive end. Mennino is going to get sick of all those big donors complaining about the mess, fecal, rubbish and otherwise and in the middle of the night, goodbye.

Mike P 10-17-2011 10:37 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Karl F (Post 892955)
Yes Pete, better days they were.. the Doc made house calls, and was paid money.. if he came in the evening, he was most likely made a drink by the old man, and mom cooked him a home made dinner... at least it worked that way in my house... back then... the doc was not buried in student loans, malpractise insurance costs, lawyers fees, only needed one secretary/bookeeper, most likley his wife, no the staff, that plauges the doctors of today.. I could rant on the other stuff too.. but will stop now..thanks for the trip down memory lane, and as the Prophet, George Carlin stated.. "You know why the call it the American Dream don't you?.. It's 'cause you have to be asleep to believe it!"

There WAS a time...however...and some of us, remember... the "Owners" can't wait for us to die off.

Attachment 48778

RIJIMMY 10-17-2011 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike P (Post 893288)

I think it cynical BS. Its easy to place the blame on some invisible force ..."the man".
The owners do need obediant workers and they also need leaders, creative people, and thinkers. It takes all kinds and there are NO barriers to becoming an owner. Only your own limitations. Unfortunatley for this country, we dont have many obediant workers willing to do low paying jobs so they went overseas.

I've seen too many people, very close to me, come to this country with nothing and become successful. Fueled by hard work and sacrifice.

TheSpecialist 10-17-2011 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY (Post 893311)
I think it cynical BS. Its easy to place the blame on some invisible force ..."the man".
The owners do need obediant workers and they also need leaders, creative people, and thinkers. It takes all kinds and there are NO barriers to becoming an owner. Only your own limitations. Unfortunatley for this country, we dont have many obediant workers willing to do low paying jobs so they went overseas.

I've seen too many people, very close to me, come to this country with nothing and become successful. Fueled by hard work and sacrifice.

Most jobs went over seas so that companies could pad their pockets, make no mistake about it. Consumers never reap the benefits when a company saves money, the owners or the investors do.

If Verizon cuts the benefits that so many think are too good, do you think that you as a consumer will reap some savings off your monthly bill? If you think that keep dreaming....

Piscator 10-17-2011 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RIJIMMY (Post 893311)

I've seen too many people, very close to me, come to this country with nothing and become successful. Fueled by hard work and sacrifice.

Like Thomas J. Flatley who came here from Ireland in 1950 with $32 in his pocket, he only ended up making about $1.6 Billion. Gave millions back to charities. His business continues even though he passed on.

RIJIMMY 10-17-2011 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 893316)
Like Thomas J. Flatley who came here from Ireland in 1950 with $32 in his pocket, he only ended up making about $1.6 Billion. Gave millions back to charities. His business continues even though he passed on.

My wife and her family came here when she was 11, father died shortly after,mom was dirt poor and didnt speak english, she put her self through college working nights, her brothers opened their own business and put themselves through school. All are very, very successful.

RIJIMMY 10-17-2011 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893314)
Most jobs went over seas so that companies could pad their pockets, make no mistake about it. Consumers never reap the benefits when a company saves money, the owners or the investors do.

True - but its because its too expensive to manufacture here. If it were cheaper, they would not go overseas.

If Verizon cuts the benefits that so many think are too good, do you think that you as a consumer will reap some savings off your monthly bill? If you think that keep dreaming....

I agree, but as a consumer I can go elsewhere and so can employees. If VZ cant get the people to do the jobs, they'll have to improve wages and benefits to attract employees.

Im not saying its a perfect system, its not. I'm saying its not some trap or conspiracy, many work the system to their benefit. It takes sacrifice and work. I think the majority of americans are afraid of hard work. Its much easier to be cynical and blame the man than picking up a shovel and digging through the BS.

Piscator 10-17-2011 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893314)
If Verizon cuts the benefits that so many think are too good, do you think that you as a consumer will reap some savings off your monthly bill? If you think that keep dreaming....

I know you mention Verzion to make a point but have you ever had a Verizon guy come to your house? I can honestly say that there was 1 guy that actually was good out of probably 10 I've had come over. The others were the laziest "I'm beating the system" types of guys I've ever met. I have friends that used to work for Verizon, believe me the stories are insane. Guys getting all over other guys that have more than 4 completes in a day etc, etc. They are purposely underperforming so expectations aren't too high.

To follow up to your point, if a company like Verizon continues to increase benefits the consumer will bear the additional cost as an increase in their bill. In a free market, that is where competition steps in .

TheSpecialist 10-17-2011 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 893341)
I know you mention Verzion to make a point but have you ever had a Verizon guy come to your house? I can honestly say that there was 1 guy that actually was good out of probably 10 I've had come over. The others were the laziest "I'm beating the system" types of guys I've ever met. I have friends that used to work for Verizon, believe me the stories are insane. Guys getting all over other guys that have more than 4 completes in a day etc, etc. They are purposely underperforming so expectations aren't too high.

To follow up to your point, if a company like Verizon continues to increase benefits the consumer will bear the additional cost as an increase in their bill. In a free market, that is where competition steps in .

First I will say I am one of those guys. Second work is like a marathon some guys are extremely fast, but make many errors, others are very slow and make very few errors, then there are alot of guys in between. When I started 15 years ago a guy had to do 2- 2.5 repairs a day. Then it was raised every year. The number is not so much for us as much as it is to keep from paying managers their yearly bonuses for not making their quota. When you make the number they say, hmm he made it we need to raise the bar. At what point does the bar stop being raised? Seriously there is way more to doing a job than most people think, like not climbing a pole in front of your house until you inspect that pole, and the ones on each side. This alone takes approximately 10-15 minutes per pole. Multiply that by the number of climbs it takes for a guy working off of a ladder all day and you start to see some discrepancy between ladder guys, and bucket truck guys. But we all have the same target number. So my friend it is not as simple as you make it seem. ;)

As your second point Verizon is not increasing prices to pay more for us, we are pretty much looking to keep what we have. They will not however lower your bill if we settle for less. In the free market the consumer is going to set the price, right now Verizon is beating the pants off of the competition when it comes to that. FWIw they made in the neighborhood of 16 Billion last year and because of tax loopholes paid very little in income tax.

detbuch 10-17-2011 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike P (Post 893288)

If the "owners" own everybody and everything and the media and what you see and hear, then it follows that Carlin, being owned, is a schill for the "owners." I would, therefore, be wary of what he says--might be some sort of trap laid by the "owners." Oh, oh . . . we are all owned . . . this forum is OWNED . . . all these posts must be propaganda paid for and ordered by the "owners." But, of course, you can trust me and Spence.

spence 10-17-2011 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 892879)
I thought you were for the bailout? Some disaster was supposed to happen without it? Is it the HUGE risks and the miserable failure that you object to? Then why bail them out? Why reward the miserable failure? Do the bonuses put tens of thousands out of work?

I think the bailout was probably necessary to stop a cataclysmic chain of events. Even I didn't realize the degree to which our economy was channeled through so few bottlenecks.

That being said, the bigger issue seems to be the one way valve attached to the system. Taxpayers bail out the banks, but seem to have little leverage after the fact.

Quote:

The protesters not only don't like the banks, or the bailouts that you approve of, but they also don't like capitalism. They want to eliminate capitalism. To them, apparently, the essence of capitalism is the creation of a 1% which sucks the life out of the 99% simply because that is their goal. Capitalism isn't about private property ownership, private investment to promote private business, a symbiotic financial relationship with free market enterprise for them-- it is the destruction of all that. I don't think they have a clear concept of what the word means. People use "capitalism" to mean all sorts of things, good or bad. Like most "systems," it depends on who use them and to what ends that create good or bad outcomes. Capitalism, for the most part, has facilitated some of the greatest economic good. Some "miserable failures" have resulted from its misuse. I don't know, nor do I suspect many of the prostesters know, what economic/financial method they want to replace capitalism. It sounds like they want more government control--some form of socialism.
I don't think there's really a desire to destroy capitalism. The debate in this country isn't about free markets vs socialism. It's more like a fantasy free market vs a managed market. Even the most liberal of proposals don't look much at all like real socialism. Given a Republican President and Congress our economy will still look more like a managed market than a true free market.

If anything, this movement -- in the US at least -- is fueled by a simple frustration as is the Tea Party. Like the Tea Party the crazies get most of the attention, but the undercurrent is very similar.

Quote:

Wha??? How did the so-called "American Dream" get involved with all this mess? What the heck IS the American Dream? What is your idea of the American Dream? Do the protesters have the same vision of an American Dream that you do?
Somewhat tongue in cheek, but still to the point. I think the protesters think that the game has become increasingly rigged. Some of this might be to naivety of those just entering the workforce and some could be the expectations we put on ourselves.

I guess the bottom line is if you believe our current system (government and private) is really best positioning our resources and people to achieve in this century. It can't all be left to the free market, much of which has long since sold out a lot of the USA in the name of shareholder value.

The bottom bottom line is that we need transformative leadership. While not the disaster some would make him out to be, Obama has not lived up to expectations and the GOP field isn't offering anything really new.

-spence

Piscator 10-17-2011 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893362)
First I will say I am one of those guys.

Maybe you were the 1 out of 10 that came to my house that was good :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893362)
Second work is like a marathon some guys are extremely fast, but make many errors, others are very slow and make very few errors, then there are alot of guys in between.

I could be wrong but my feeling is the Union as a whole takes care of the guys that are average or subpar but not much for the great ones.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893362)
When I started 15 years ago a guy had to do 2- 2.5 repairs a day. Then it was raised every year. The number is not so much for us as much as it is to keep from paying managers their yearly bonuses for not making their quota.

I’m in sales and I have to produce each year and build off the year before. If I don’t they will be looking for someone to replace me. It not only makes me work harder and try to achieve more, but it also gives me satisfaction in reaching a new goals.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893362)
When you make the number they say, hmm he made it we need to raise the bar. At what point does the bar stop being raised? Seriously there is way more to doing a job than most people think, like not climbing a pole in front of your house until you inspect that pole, and the ones on each side. This alone takes approximately 10-15 minutes per pole. Multiply that by the number of climbs it takes for a guy working off of a ladder all day and you start to see some discrepancy between ladder guys, and bucket truck guys. But we all have the same target number. So my friend it is not as simple as you make it seem. ;)

Great point, I totally agree that it’s not apples to apples (my buddy’s were more in the city and didn’t have to deal with poles too much). But if productivity stays the same and does not increase then it would be hard to justify future raises etc. Maybe the system to evaluate needs to be changed so that guys aren’t hitting say 4 completes before lunch and expected to shut down for the day by their peers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 893362)
As your second point Verizon is not increasing prices to pay more for us, we are pretty much looking to keep what we have. They will not however lower your bill if we settle for less. In the free market the consumer is going to set the price, right now Verizon is beating the pants off of the competition when it comes to that. FWIw they made in the neighborhood of 16 Billion last year and because of tax loopholes paid very little in income tax.

They is not only the managers and Verizon executives, “they” are the shareholders. Verizon has a very high stock dividend yield and many investors (some probably guys on this site) are the “they” sharing in the profits via stocks, dividends, 401K etc.

detbuch 10-17-2011 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence (Post 893422)
I think the bailout was probably necessary to stop a cataclysmic chain of events. Even I didn't realize the degree to which our economy was channeled through so few bottlenecks.

The entire "economy" is not channeled through whatever few bottlenecks to which you refer. Had the banks that were bailed out not been bailed out, there would have remained a large "economy" that survived the "cataclysm."

That being said, the bigger issue seems to be the one way valve attached to the system. Taxpayers bail out the banks, but seem to have little leverage after the fact.

Taxpayers have the same or lack the same "leverage" before bail outs as they do after. They have the power of the vote and their individual and collective initiatives. Those powers, forgive my constitutional tourrettes, would be far greater if our Federal Government was restrained by constitutional limits. With the present juggernaut of Federal power colluding with big money and "managing" the "market," the taxpayer loses much of the power granted to him by the Constitution and becomes the ultimate bottleneck through which unconstitutional federal mandates, regulations, and agencies are funded. And the contributions to that Federal Government by big monied banks and businesses gets them immunity from failure or the pork to fund worthless Solyndras.

I don't think there's really a desire to destroy capitalism. The debate in this country isn't about free markets vs socialism. It's more like a fantasy free market vs a managed market. Even the most liberal of proposals don't look much at all like real socialism. Given a Republican President and Congress our economy will still look more like a managed market than a true free market.

One of the stated desires of the protesters, at least by those who have spoken, is to eliminate capitalism. As for the debate "in this country" by which I take it that you mean beyond the protesters--there really doesn't seem to be a debate. If you pose a debate between free market vs managed market, that's more symantic than real. All markets are "managed" by those acting within the markets. The degree of freedom is proportional to how much managing is done within the market as opposed to how much regulation and restriction is imposed by external force, Government. If the market is "managed" by government, it is not a market in the traditional sense, but a command economy. Obviously, all markets have had external force applied, as well as internal forces within, so none has ever been totally free. Not as a whole. The degree to which there are free transactions within a "market" (transactions freely performed between buyer and seller) will determine how free a market is. Modern socialism comes in many forms. Just as there is no totally free market, there is no totally pure form of "real" socialism. There are degrees of socialism.

If anything, this movement -- in the US at least -- is fueled by a simple frustration as is the Tea Party. Like the Tea Party the crazies get most of the attention, but the undercurrent is very similar.

If the undercurrent is very similar, why is there such a difference? Are the objectives of the Tea Party and the Occupiers similar?

Somewhat tongue in cheek, but still to the point. I think the protesters think that the game has become increasingly rigged. Some of this might be to naivety of those just entering the workforce and some could be the expectations we put on ourselves.

"Increasingly" rigged? So, is there a certain amount of rigging that is acceptable. But, then, beyond a quantifiable amount, at that point we rise up and say no more?

I guess the bottom line is if you believe our current system (government and private) is really best positioning our resources and people to achieve in this century. It can't all be left to the free market, much of which has long since sold out a lot of the USA in the name of shareholder value.

"It," whatever that is, has never "all" been "left" to the free market. The market has never been so free that "all" was left to it. And the market is not a living thing that can sell out anything. It is the interaction of individual people and entitities transacting in different self interested ways and selling and buying individual comodities most of the time outside the ken of shareholder value. Nor is the USA an entity that can be sold by a market.

The bottom bottom line is that we need transformative leadership. While not the disaster some would make him out to be, Obama has not lived up to expectations and the GOP field isn't offering anything really new.

-spence

Transform what to what? Obama is trying to transform. Too much of us are resisting his transformation. But he may yet succeed. Give him Health Care and another term. So what is it, Spence, that needs to be transformed?

JohnnyD 10-18-2011 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piscator (Post 893423)
I could be wrong but my feeling is the Union as a whole takes care of the guys that are average or subpar but not much for the great ones.

*THIS* is my biggest issue with Unions and is the source of most trouble when dealing with them.

Unions result in no incentive to excel.

Whether it is a teacher's union, Verizon union, Teamsters or any other Local union - the guys who excel are reprimanded (or worse) by their coworkers. If one guy works too hard or puts in too much effort, it makes the lazy bum in the other truck look bad. There's also no incentive to excel because most union contracts provide guidelines of the work required. The union employees are only obligated to do the minimum required work and then that's it.

I know a number of union truck drivers. They get more leisure reading done during a work-week than I do in a year. Why? Because when they are running ahead of their minimum schedule, they sit at the loading dock and kill time as opposed to calling in for another load.

TheSpecialist 10-18-2011 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnnyD (Post 893481)
*THIS* is my biggest issue with Unions and is the source of most trouble when dealing with them.

Unions result in no incentive to excel.

Whether it is a teacher's union, Verizon union, Teamsters or any other Local union - the guys who excel are reprimanded (or worse) by their coworkers. If one guy works too hard or puts in too much effort, it makes the lazy bum in the other truck look bad. There's also no incentive to excel because most union contracts provide guidelines of the work required. The union employees are only obligated to do the minimum required work and then that's it.

I know a number of union truck drivers. They get more leisure reading done during a work-week than I do in a year. Why? Because when they are running ahead of their minimum schedule, they sit at the loading dock and kill time as opposed to calling in for another load.

Let pose this question. In school, elementary through college, would you agree that some people (5% maybe) are at the top of the class, some (15% maybe ) are at the bottom of the class, and everyone else is pretty much considered average? Also some people reach that upper percentile, and average percentile based on a grading curve.

Well unfortunately businesses don't work that way. They grade everyone the same no matter what. We always help the slower guys when our work is done , so that the job gets done here. It doesn't matter if I am a little faster or slower to my coworkers. It is the guys that work so fast that they do not follow all safety practices, and someone gets hurt or worse killed. We have had numerous injuries and deaths in the last 5 years from that. Why shouldn't there be a level playing field?

Let me pose this ? Should a business owner who hires non resident or non citizens, be allowed to work the same projects as legitimate businesses that follow the hiring rules?

Not every union works the same, trade unions are way different than public sector unions, which are way different than union shops at a business. There are bad apples everywhere. Show me a family that can own a home or even rent one here in the north east on a salary of $12.00 an hour.

There is no use in explaining it though, cause if you are against ii, you are against it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com