Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating
Page 9 of 12 « First 5678 9 101112
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   Staggering COVID-19 Statistic: 98% to 99% of Americans Dying are Unvaccinated (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=97838)

wdmso 01-20-2022 09:12 AM
The Florida Department of Health has placed a top official on administrative leave after he criticised staff over their vaccination rate.


In an email on 4 January, Dr Raul Pino called unvaccinated staff members "irresponsible" and wrote "we are not even at 50% - pathetic".
Legislation passed in Florida late last year prohibits employers, public and private, from mandating jabs.

Don’t see and mandating in that email

Jim in CT 01-20-2022 09:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1220969)
https://sites.utexas.edu/contemporar...ailure-report/


And from a different article.
Earlier this month, the President’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) declared that the War on Poverty launched by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964 is “largely over and a success.” Although it is premature to declare an outright and absolute victory, it’s great that policymakers at the highest level of government recognize that our social safety net programs are working.

But if we are to continue to reduce hardship and promote mobility from poverty through access to good jobs, work and other means, we have to understand the nature of poverty today. It's important that we draw the right lessons from the past so we don’t underestimate our current challenges and cede our hard-won progress in the War on Poverty.

Let’s start with the good news in the CEA report: material well-being in the United States has improved considerably. The poverty rate has also declined over the last few decades, although you wouldn’t know it if you looked just at the official poverty rate, which has not fluctuated greatly since the 1960s, ranging from 10 to 15 percent.

The official poverty rate draws a threshold based on food consumption patterns from the 1950s and considers only pretax cash income as available resources. Consequently, the official poverty rate understates both the needs of today’s families and the resources available to them. In fact, two of our largest sources of support to low-income families—the earned income tax credit (EITC) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—don’t count in our official poverty measure.

Recognizing the limitations of the official poverty measure, the Census Bureau developed a supplemental poverty measure (SPM) in 2009 that better captures needs and resources.

When researchers extended the SPM back in time, they found that the poverty rate dropped from 26 percent in 1967 to 16 percent in 2012 and to about 14 percent in 2016, more accurately capturing poverty’s downward trend than does the official poverty measure. In addition, without SNAP and refundable tax credits, the poverty rate would have been 3.7 percentage points higher than it was in 2016. Expansions of the EITC and SNAP have alleviated poverty in ways the SPM reflects and the official poverty measure misses.

Limitations of a consumption-based poverty rate
The “too good to be true” news from the CEA is that the poverty rate declined from 30 percent in 1960 to just 3 percent in 2016 when applying a “consumption-based” poverty measure, which measures what a family consumes instead of how much income it earns. A consumption-based poverty measure has some merit. After all, a family with no income but substantial assets would be considered “income poor” but could be consuming at comfortable levels.

Because there is no official measure of consumption-based poverty, the CEA relies on the work of economists Bruce Meyer and James Sullivan. To develop a consumption-based poverty rate, Meyer and Sullivan need accurate data on consumption and a meaningful standard for how much a family needs to consume to have a minimally adequate standard of living. Some scholars have expressed concerns about the data Meyer and Sullivan use to construct their consumption-based poverty rate.

Those concerns aside, the consumption-based poverty rate from Meyer and Sullivan that the CEA cites is indexed to 1980, an arbitrary threshold that might understate the hardship and need families experience today. Using this measure allows the CEA to suggest that poverty isn’t much a problem in the US today.

Drawing a meaningful threshold for consumption-based poverty is a challenge—for example, when the authors equate the consumption and official poverty rates in 2015 and then apply their techniques backward, they find that nearly 40 percent of Americans were poor in 1980, and nearly 60 percent were poor in 1960. Those levels are too high to be a meaningful indication of overall hardship in those years. Similarly, the 3 percent figure touted by the CEA for 2016 is too low.

Further, crossing a given consumption threshold does not mean you have the power and control over your resources and life to not be “poor.” Exposing yourself or your children to a potentially abusive situation just to have a roof over your head or trading sex for food or income might keep you out of consumption poverty, but you are still poor.

The role of antipoverty programs
Although it’s too soon to declare the War on Poverty over, it is important to recognize the progress we have made and the important role our antipoverty programs such as SNAP and EITC have played in that success. Use of a consumption-based poverty measure should neither lead to a misguided belief that the War on Poverty has been won nor justify making major changes—however well intentioned—to safety net programs that risk cutting people off from the very programs that have kept them out of poverty.

Well-designed reforms that help recipients overcome their barriers to work, supplement and support their efforts to work, and recognize that some recipients will be limited in the amount and type of work they can do can help us make even more progress against poverty.
“the war on poverty is over and a success.”

Paul, i can find someone who will
write that i am the spitting image of Brad Pitt and post it. That doesn’t make it so.

You’re waaay too smart to believe that. Take a drive through bridgeport or hartford, tell
me we successfully won the war on poverty. Ask any public schoolteacher in any urban school if poverty has been defeated.

I’ve lived in CT my whole life. The cities are far worse today, then when i was a kid. And they keep getting worse. They keep getting worse, because of fatherlessness and culture. Lack of money has almost nothing to do with it. You don't fix a broken culture by mailing out bigger and bigger welfare checks.

If I post an article from someone saying that Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg was a success, that doesn’t make it so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 01-20-2022 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1220970)
Paul in Jims world view

If there is any poverty then any program which try’s to stop it has failed

It’s the same with Covid , cancer , education , mask , vaccines,

Unless these changes or ideas are made by the GOP then they are considered benevolent and worthily of the effort to irradicate them

Like voter integrity laws , Tax cuts , Jan 6th , Trump himself , Abortion
my worldview…

the poorest sections of our big cities, are way worse today than 25 years ago. No comparison. there’s literally no comparison. Fatherlessness and drugs.

what’s my view on cancer wayne?

all i’ve ever said about cancer, is that biden explicitly promised we’d cure it, on the condition that he got elected. Well, he won. He’s got three years to make good.

What did i say in that paragraph, that you could say is incorrect?

Covid? Probably chinas fault, not anything that any president could have done much differently. it’s not trumps fault, it’s not biden’s fault. But Again, biden promised to beat the disease, but the numbers are worse than last year. And that’s not biden’s fault, it’s the pandemic. As TDF said, blame mother nature. But Biden promised to beat it, and it’s fair to hold him accountable for that promise.

Trump promised to build the wall and he didn’t, and i have criticized him here many times for failing to deliver on that promise. He gets a big, fat, F on that. Similarly, i criticize biden for promising to cure cancer and promising to beat covid.

Tell me, where is the hypocrisy, when i consistently and accurately criticize both presidents for failing to deliver on promises?

Biden’s promise to cure cancer, is exploiting people who are at the most desperate and vulnerarable situation that a human being can be in. it’s reptilian to try and exploit that desperation for personal gain. And that’s exactly, precisely what biden did. It does t matter if that hurts your political narrative, what matters is that’s what happened.

i can criticize republicans and democrats. you can only criticize republicans, you can only praise democrats.

Wayne, you keep defending democrats from every single criticism. Why does every poll, as well as the election results in VA and NJ, clearly suggest that America doesn't like what liberals are doing? Are the polls wrong in your opinion? If the midterms were held today, what do you really, honestly think would happen?

The polls are miserable for democrats. How does that happen, especially when every single TV station except foxnews, and all of academia, constantly pushes the notion that liberals are good and conservatives are evil?

Biden said yesterday he couldn't name one single thing that conservatives stand for. Seriously? Well he's on the path to learning a very very stark lesson in November. A lot can and likely will happen between now and then, if covid peters out and they can et a grip on inflation without causing a recession, that will be a real feather in his cap. But if the midterms were today, the democrats would get annihilated. They almost lost NJ, and NO ONE was talking about that.
There's a reason for that. I'm very curious to know what you think the reason is. Racism?


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-20-2022 09:39 AM
[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1220972]

“the war on poverty is over and a success.”


without SNAP and refundable tax credits, the poverty rate would have been 3.7 percentage points higher than it was in 2016. Expansions of the EITC and SNAP have alleviated poverty in ways the SPM reflects and the official poverty measure misses.....



if solving poverty is measured by the making people more and more reliant on government handouts and services in order to escape poverty and less reliant on themselves....

then I guess you could consider the left's war on poverty a success....great job!

Jim in CT 01-20-2022 09:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1220971)
The Florida Department of Health has placed a top official on administrative leave after he criticised staff over their vaccination rate.


In an email on 4 January, Dr Raul Pino called unvaccinated staff members "irresponsible" and wrote "we are not even at 50% - pathetic".
Legislation passed in Florida late last year prohibits employers, public and private, from mandating jabs.

Don’t see and mandating in that email
I agree with you on vaccines, I think people are being dumb. But if you're a state official, and you cross the governor (even if the governor is wrong, as I believe Desantis is getting it wrong on vaccine, which is a big thing to be wrong on), you're going to get booted.

Maybe the state of FL could learn how to tolerate dissenting opinions from democrats, who are being so very tolerant of Manchin and Sinema right now. Right?

Maxine Waters went on TV, and said Manchin and Sinema don't care about black people. You don't have chit to say about that, that's fine with you.

PaulS 01-20-2022 09:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1220972)
“the war on poverty is over and a success.”

Paul, i can find someone who will
write that i am the spitting image of Brad Pitt and post it. That doesn’t make it so.

You’re waaay too smart to believe that. Take a drive through bridgeport or hartford, tell
me we successfully won the war on poverty. Ask any public schoolteacher in any urban school if poverty has been defeated.No One said it was "defeated". You said a "reduction".


I’ve lived in CT my whole life. The cities are far worse today, then when i was a kid. And they keep getting worse. They keep getting worse, because of fatherlessness and culture. Lack of money has almost nothing to do with it. You don't fix a broken culture by mailing out bigger and bigger welfare checks.

If I post an article from someone saying that Pickett’s Charge at Gettysburg was a success, that doesn’t make it so.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Poor People's lives are much better now than they were in the 60s - not good, but better.

Jim in CT 01-20-2022 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1220980)
Poor People's lives are much better now than they were in the 60s - not good, but better.
"No One said it was "defeated"

You quoted this..."the War on Poverty launched by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964 is “largely over and a success.” Maybe I misinterpreted that, fair enough.

"Poor People's lives are much better now than they were in the 60s - not good, but better."

Not a chance. Sure, you can play with what defines "poverty" and come up with a statistic that shows that fewer people are below it, and maybe (hopefully) things like life expectancy are better for poor people today than they were 50 years ago. And maybe "poor people" today are more likely to have air conditioning, cell phones, material things I guess. And hopefully more have access to healthcare.

But again, I lived just outside of New Haven for decades, and worked in downtown Hartford for almost 15 years. Today, those places look like they can't be in America, you'd swear you were in Haiti or Somalia.

I don't think you'd find a single public schoolteacjher who has spent decades in a big city, who'd say that the socioeconomics of their students is better today than 35 years ago.

The quality of life enjoyed by our poorest children, will move in almost exact correlation with the rates of fatherlessness in those communities. As fatherlessness has exploded, so has the socioeconomic quality of life deteriorated.

Id actually love to see a poll done by all the teachers in the biggest cities who have bene there for decades, to comment on whether they see improvements or deterioration.

scottw 01-20-2022 10:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1220980)

Poor People's lives are much better now than they were in the 60s - not good, but better.
this is correct, we have color tv instead of black and white

scottw 01-20-2022 10:37 AM
[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1220981]

The quality of life enjoyed by our poorest children

/QUOTE]

parents won't feed them... poverty is so good these days that schools must feed them breakfast and lunch every day including summer or they would starve to death

did poor parents feed their kids back in the 60's or did they just starve to death on the street?

PaulS 01-20-2022 11:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1220981)
"No One said it was "defeated"

You quoted this..."the War on Poverty launched by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964 is “largely over and a success.” Maybe I misinterpreted that, fair enough.

"Poor People's lives are much better now than they were in the 60s - not good, but better."

Not a chance. Sure, you can play with what defines "poverty" and come up with a statistic that shows that fewer people are below it, and maybe (hopefully) things like life expectancy are better for poor people today than they were 50 years ago. And maybe "poor people" today are more likely to have air conditioning, cell phones, material things I guess. And hopefully more have access to healthcare.

But again, I lived just outside of New Haven for decades, and worked in downtown Hartford for almost 15 years. Today, those places look like they can't be in America, you'd swear you were in Haiti or Somalia.

I don't think you'd find a single public schoolteacjher who has spent decades in a big city, who'd say that the socioeconomics of their students is better today than 35 years ago.

The quality of life enjoyed by our poorest children, will move in almost exact correlation with the rates of fatherlessness in those communities. As fatherlessness has exploded, so has the socioeconomic quality of life deteriorated.

Id actually love to see a poll done by all the teachers in the biggest cities who have bene there for decades, to comment on whether they see improvements or deterioration.
You said a reduction in poverty and I showed you there has been a reduction in poverty.

N.H. is far better than it was in the past (and I lived in the NH area for years). Hartford too (I worked there 20 years). Parts of America (Kent, WV, Appalachia, Miss. etc) had no sewers, running water, electricity and people lived in tin huts. Schools are better for those people. Food security is better.

Jim in CT 01-20-2022 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1220994)
You said a reduction in poverty and I showed you there has been a reduction in poverty.

N.H. is far better than it was in the past (and I lived in the NH area for years). Hartford too (I worked there 20 years). Parts of America (Kent, WV, Appalachia, Miss. etc) had no sewers, running water, electricity and people lived in tin huts. Schools are better for those people. Food security is better.
"You said a reduction in poverty and I showed you there has been a reduction in poverty."

True enough.

"N.H. is far better than it was in the past (and I lived in the NH area for years). Hartford too (I worked there 20 years)"

I guess it depends on when you're comparing today to. If you're comparing today to the time of the Great Depression, sure it's better today. If you're comparing today to 20 years ago, I just don't see how you could say that it's in any way better. The cities are way more dysfunctional.

Again, it would be interesting to see what cops or teachers, who've been there for decades, would say. Maybe I'm thinking more of social/family dysfunctionality than wealth/poverty, I don't know.

I do know that when I grew up in west Haven, we only had one car which my dad usually drove to work. When I was really little, for a treat my mom would walk us to the bus stop, we'd take the bus to New Haven, have lunch, maybe pick out a toy at the toy store. We wouldn't think of doing that today. It would be way too dangerous and unpleasant.

In the 15 years I worked in downtown Hartford, the blight, the aggressive panhandling, was way way worse at the end of my time, than the beginning. There were times I felt like I was walking in Haiti.

scottw 01-20-2022 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1220994)

Parts of America (Kent, WV, Appalachia, Miss. etc) had no sewers, running water, electricity and people lived in tin huts. Schools are better for those people. Food security is better.
it's almost like the current tent cities in democrat cities across America

wdmso 01-20-2022 01:05 PM
So we haven’t defeated poverty We haven’t had a balanced budget in decades we haven’t won a war since WW2

And conservatives complain as if Republicans never held public office or the White House …. It’s always someone else’s fault

Jim in CT 01-20-2022 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1221010)
So we haven’t defeated poverty We haven’t had a balanced budget in decades we haven’t won a war since WW2

And conservatives complain as if Republicans never held public office or the White House …. It’s always someone else’s fault
except i never said the gop has no blame. they have lots of blame.

keep
making things up though.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso 01-20-2022 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1221011)
except i never said the gop has no blame. they have lots of blame.

keep
making things up though.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
If I was referring to you and only you I would use your name . I Don’t see Jim in my post ..

scottw 01-22-2022 08:36 AM
JAN. 20, 2022 9 PM PT
SACRAMENTO —

Under a bill introduced Thursday by a California lawmaker children in the state would be allowed to make their own vaccination decisions. Senate Bill 866 by Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) would permit children 12 and older to be vaccinated, including against COVID-19, without a parent’s consent or knowledge.

wdmso 01-22-2022 04:02 PM
Virginia parent charged by police after threatening to ‘bring every single gun’ if school board doesn’t make masks optional

but but liberals

detbuch 01-22-2022 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1221156)
Virginia parent charged by police after threatening to ‘bring every single gun’ if school board doesn’t make masks optional

but but liberals
Did you just find a needle in a haystack?

Jim in CT 01-22-2022 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch (Post 1221157)
Did you just find a needle in a haystack?
yes. a conservative did something very bad, therefore we are all guilty for it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 01-22-2022 04:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1221156)
Virginia parent charged by police after threatening to ‘bring every single gun’ if school board doesn’t make masks optional

but but liberals
yup. find one kook, claim they speak for all of us.

but but the polls.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F. 01-22-2022 11:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1221162)
yup. find one kook, claim they speak for all of us.

but but the polls.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Hmmm
Does ivermectin cure home field playoff losses? Just asking...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-23-2022 05:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1221156)
Virginia parent charged by police after threatening to ‘bring every single gun’ if school board doesn’t make masks optional

but but liberals
I read the story...I bet she doesn't even own any guns

“I in no way meant to imply all guns loaded as in actual firearms, but rather all resources I can muster to make sure my children get to attend schools without masks” she wrote. “Sincere apologies for my poor choice in words.”

scottw 01-23-2022 05:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1221183)

Hmmm
Does ivermectin cure home field playoff losses? Just asking...


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
not sure...but it's probably just as effective in preventing infections from omicron as two shots and two boosters...probably need yet another booster..because..."omicron stealth"

JERUSALEM, Jan 17 (Reuters) - A fourth shot of COVID-19 vaccine boosts antibodies to even higher levels than the third jab but it is not enough to prevent Omicron infections, according to a preliminary study in Israel.

Jim in CT 01-23-2022 07:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1221185)
I read the story...I bet she doesn't even own any guns

“I in no way meant to imply all guns loaded as in actual firearms, but rather all resources I can muster to make sure my children get to attend schools without masks” she wrote. “Sincere apologies for my poor choice in words.”
let’s throw her in Guantanamo Bay.
but it’s ok when chuck schumer says the supreme court will “reap the whirlwind and never know what hit them”, if they continue to make decisions he doesn’t like. That’s ok.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F. 01-23-2022 08:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1221185)
I read the story...I bet she doesn't even own any guns

“I in no way meant to imply all guns loaded as in actual firearms, but rather all resources I can muster to make sure my children get to attend schools without masks” she wrote. “Sincere apologies for my poor choice in words.”
So you think it’s not worth worrying about, I’m sure the parents watching the school board meeting on cable just said meh🤡
Bullying is just the American way

Aaron Rodgers and the Packers can still make it to the Super Bowl if Mike Pence has enough courage.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-23-2022 08:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1221190)

So you think it’s not worth worrying about

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I think she was arrested and will be explaining herself to a judge...so, no it's not worth worrying about

scottw 01-23-2022 08:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1221190)

Bullying is just the American way


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
yeah...we've noticed

scottw 01-23-2022 08:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1221189)

but it’s ok when chuck schumer says the supreme court will “reap the whirlwind and never know what hit them”, if they continue to make decisions he doesn’t like. That’s ok.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
more specifically.."You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

sounds like bullying...

Jim in CT 01-23-2022 09:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1221196)
more specifically.."You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

sounds like bullying...
if it was a republican who said it, that would be threatening. when the democrat senate majority leader says it, they ignore it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Dad Fisherman 01-23-2022 09:49 AM
"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere."

Let me guess, false equivalency, or missing context, or something else equally as absurd

But definitely NOT bullying :rolleyes:

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 01-23-2022 09:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman (Post 1221203)
"If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere."

Let me guess, false equivalency, or missing context, or something else equally as absurd

But definitely NOT bullying :rolleyes:

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
how do you not see the false equivalency?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Pete F. 01-23-2022 10:58 AM
The vaccine reduces the severity of COVID so much that Aaron Rodgers is unvaccinated and yet his receivers didn't catch anything significant.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-23-2022 11:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1221217)

The vaccine reduces the severity of COVID so much

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
like Tylenol and Motrin

Pete F. 01-23-2022 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1221222)
like Tylenol and Motrin
Three large studies by the CDC show just how vital booster shots are when it comes to preventing hospitalization and death, especially among one age group.

The first study, released Friday, looked at almost 88,000 hospitalizations in 10 states found that booster shots were 90% effective at keeping people with the omicron variant of COVID-19 out of the hospital. The data was collected during December and January when the omicron was dominant.

Ivermectin provides full protection against the NFC Championship Game.

After the game, Aaron Rodgers was pleading with the officials to find him 4 more points.
I mean, he did have 77% of the points until those late points came in out of nowhere. Clearly fraudulent....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-23-2022 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1221234)

Three large studies by the CDC show just how vital booster shots are when it comes to preventing hospitalization and death, especially among one age group.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
yes, if you are old and in poor health...it might help...

scottw 01-23-2022 05:59 PM
"a pandemic of the bureaucracy"...what are the
mask/vax nazis going to do when most of their friends leave them for freedom?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bQ2rctogOs

wdmso 01-24-2022 08:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1221245)
"a pandemic of the bureaucracy"...what are the
mask/vax nazis going to do when most of their friends leave them for freedom?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bQ2rctogOs
It’s fitting you post the childish rant of a pouty baby.. whos. done with Covid , reflecting your own feelings somehow represents liberals because she’s on Bill’s show..

ask a nurses if their done with Covid I bet they are ! But for much different reasons Not just because they’re ask to wear a mask..

Even Liberals are not immune to simpleton Arguments
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso 01-24-2022 11:49 AM
Stressed hospitals are asking workers with covid to return — even if they may be infectious


But people are done with Covid .. it seems Covid isn’t done with The human race
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 01-24-2022 12:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1221259)

It’s fitting you post the childish rant of a pouty baby..


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
interesting that one of her points was that other liberals and progressives she knows feel similar to her but they know that saying so will result in them being mindlessly attacked and called names by lunatics...great job making her point :humpty:

wdmso 01-24-2022 05:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1221280)
interesting that one of her points was that other liberals and progressives she knows feel similar to her but they know that saying so will result in them being mindlessly attacked and called names by lunatics...great job making her point :humpty:
What your not a pouty child ? It’s hard to tell from your Posts

And I love the . well she knows a friend who feels the same way

A huge difference from being tired of Covid and dismissive of Covid outright. Ps that’s what your doing like Tylenol and Motrin

Id say that’s a simpletons response but then I would be accused of calling you stupid :kewl:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.
Page 9 of 12 « First 5678 9 101112
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com