![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He’s afraid of a lot.
Reminder: we still have never seen Trump’s school records, medical records, tax returns, minutes from meetings with Putin or WH visitor logs. He won’t say who he owes 400m to and he won’t submit his DNA from a case that is just one of his decades of sex crimes. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Classic Whatabout.....
That’s what happens to cult members Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Again, how about one set of rules/standards, and we apply them equally to all presidents, regardless of party. Crazy, I know. |
Quote:
|
One standard, huh?
Reminder: we still have never seen Trump’s medical records, tax returns, minutes from meetings with Putin or WH visitor logs. He won’t say who he owes 400m to and he won’t submit his DNA from a case that is just one of his decades of sex crimes. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ok, I get it. |
Quote:
Going too fast for you? |
Quote:
Now, can you admit that Biden is also a hypocrite on the issue? Biden came up with the 'Biden rule' where he said that Supreme Court nominations should not be made in an election year, and if a president made a nomination, the senate should block that nomination. That's exactly, precisely what the Senate Republicans did with Garland, they abided by the Biden rule. Then in 2016, Biden flip flopped, saying an election year nomination was OK. Now hes saying its not OK. So you please tell me GS, what is Bidens position on this issue? Answer - his position is the same as the Republican position, they will say whatever helps them in that moment. No principles. I admitted the Senate Republicans were hypocrites. Please explain to all of us, how Biden isn't just as big a hypocrite. |
Quote:
Now? No one had any idea he'd be this effective. Heck he didn't even campaign on progress in the middle east, and he's done more in a term than Biden has done in 47 years. Tax cuts, insanely low unemployment, brought ISIS to their knees, stock market records, no questionable wars, raises for vets and improvements to their benefits, school choice, criminal justice reform, lowest minority unemployment ever, improved funding for black colleges, economic opportunity zones, and we became energy independent. And agree with him or not, he's the most pro-life president by far, of my lifetime. Yeah, why would any Republican get behind a guy who did that in one term? What a do-nothing slacker! You sure showed me with that post, GS. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, sorry if that's going too fast for you. |
Quote:
What does Trump have to hide? He said he was #1 in his class at Wharton. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's how it usually works, yes. But since a record 56% of pople say they are better off now than 4 years ago (that's a record who said yes to that), it seems that I'm not exactly the only one who feels that way. We can evaluate him as we see fit and vote accordingly, as it should be. I was responding to your inane comment that Republicans shouldn't be supporting him because of his manners. If you agree with the republican platform, you have to give the guy at least a B+. Adding to the debt is a big, big negative. Is it only a certain point of view that would say he routed ISIS? "your guy should be winning this election by huge margins. " If the election was a year ago, he probably would have. "he was such a failure at handling this pandemic" That's the non-stop spin. I don't happen to buy into it being all his fault, but I'm guessing a lot of people believe it is his fault, and he gets creamed as a result. That's my guess. "The irony is that if he wasn’t so fu*cking stupid at handling this pandemic he might have actually easily won a second term. Please don’t fall back on your staple travel ban argument, it just makes you look stupid and desperate" I'm not stupid or desperate. I'm smart and more than prepared for him to lose big. You guys are the ones that can't concede ANYTHING that goes against your agenda, which obviously makes you the desperate ones. What should he have done, back in December, based on what we knew then. What were the democrats calling for? You're misrepresenting my stance on the travel ban. I'm not saying it helped or it didn't. WHat I'm saying, because its tue, is that when he implemented the ban, prominent democrats said it was an overreaction. Biden called it "hysterical" and "xenophobic". This means that Biden would have done LESS, not more. Since that's obviously true (Biden would have done less), how would anyone conclude the death toll would be lower if Biden was POTUS? I'm asking a sincere question. Will you answer it as I asked it? Also, if he could tone down the tweets and baby rhetoric, he'd also be looking at a likely second term. But he can't, he just can't refrain from being such a jerk. But his results, from a republican view, were really good. |
Quote:
|
They did poll them and they aren’t better off but that poll doesn’t fit the Fox narrative so he’ll never see it
Meanwhile many of the folks that helped Trump ‘win’ the last election can no longer vote for him in this election because they are now convicted felons. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
that happened. i’m sorry if you have no response whatsoever to that fact. but that’s the fact, the democrats said it was no big deal in january february. GS: trump blew it with the virus. Jim: what should he have done differently? GS: you’re a jerk! that’s all you got. how can you say he blew it, when you can’t tell me what he should have done differently? this is like a sitcom. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
condemn white supremacists at charlottesville, right? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com