No, a normal person wouldn’t feel guilty about doing well in the market, because despite what liberals tend to believe, his success in the market, isn’t causing anyone else to fail. Why should
he feel guilty if he is better at investing than someone else?

If soros does better in the stock market than i do, that’s one thing. soros collaborating with Nazis, is a wee bit different.

you people are completely insane. you’re comparing soros getting better investment returns than someone else, to collaborating with Nazis?

Ill ask again...what are you afraid will happen to you, if you admit that a normal person would feel some guilt for choosing ( even under godawful threats) to collaborate with Holicaust perpetrators? Do you think you’d die if you admitted he has a screw loose?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How did Soros make a billion dollars in a day?
Others lost.
He's a trader, not an investor.
George Soros is most famous for his single-day gain of $1 billion on September 16, 1992, which he made by short selling the British pound. At the time, England was part of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, a fixed exchange-rate system that included other European countries. The other countries were pressuring England to devalue its currency in relation to the other countries in the system or to leave the system. England resisted the devaluation, but with continued pressure from the fixed system and speculators in the currency market, England floated its currency and the value of the pound suffered. By leveraging the value of his fund, Soros was able to take a $10 billion short position on the pound, which earned him $1 billion. This trade is considered one of the greatest trades of all time, and Soros is often credited as the man who broke the Bank of England.

"How did Soros make a billion dollars in a day?
Others lost."

The loss of others, was NOT a requirement for Soros to win. Like many ignorant people, you think the economy is a zero sum game. It's not. There's no mathematical law saying that someone has to fail in order for someone else to succeed. It's not finite. It's possible that every stock on the exchange can go up in a given day, that does NOT mean anyone else necessarily lost anything. How can you not get that?

Others losing, isn't "how" he won, not unless he cheated. Are you saying he cheated? Was he involved in a 'pump and dump'?

He bet the value of the pound would decrease. His bet, did not cause the pound to decrease.

He didn't cause it but it was basically similar to a pump that got dumped, done by the Bank of England to try and prop up the pound that he took advantage of. Others lost, he gained.
So, you're correct, he no more caused that loss than he caused the loss of property to the transported Jews.

"He didn't cause it but it was basically similar to a pump that got dumped"

But it didn't get dumped because of him. If he didn't contribut eto it, he has no reason to feel guilty.

"he no more caused that loss than he caused the loss of property to the transported Jews"

In the 60 Minutes interview, he didn't deny helping the Nazis seize Jewish property. He said he didn't feel guilty about it, which necessarily means he concedes that he did it. So I'm not sure how you seem to know more about his role, than he does.

If he didn't help the Nazis, he would have said "I didn't help the Nazis". What he said was that he helped them, and he doesn't feel guilty about it.

The liberals here are all over the place on this. The only thing you can agree on, is that you can't bear to admit what he himself admits.

Do you ever contemplate that maybe you’re just wrong?

Snopes!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Walk thru you logic
He didn’t cause the market loss no guilt
He didn’t cause the holocaust no guilt
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That's the issue you think beck Ann colter and all the other fringe right have the math right... but not sure how 2+2= nazi collaborator ..because they cleary think that . just saying regardless of the Truth and for the record i found his lack of empathy alarming but not as evidence of wrong doing being in the SS and all the other bs

i’m wrong very often. Not here.

What’s in this Snopes piece, which could possibly be more revealing, that wht Soros said himself?
‘Snopes’ isn’t a response. Give me some details.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He actively helped the nazis confiscate property from jews. He didn’t cause the Holicaust, but he collaborated with those who did. He admitted this to steve croft. if you still didn’t get how that’s a tad more sinister than innocently playing the commodities market, i can’t help you, try to find a pop-up book that explains it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, here's a video which explains why the Snopes thing is a lie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNGMvPMjXp4

This will not convince Spence or wdmso or PeteF, et al., but
it is a rebuttal of Snopes--take it for what you will.

Wow funny they didn't cover the real guy in the SS uniform you got SMOKING GUN NOT NICE TRY.. so you in the nazi collaborator camp. of course you are

IT'S CALLED BEING 14 YEARS OLD ..... even if he moved 100 suit case's from 1 pile to another or just watched neither makes a 14 year old who is aware what will happen to him if they find out he is a JEW a NAZI Collaborator which you insist he is .....

History is full of people doing what was necessary to survive .. we all know why he's a conservative target... minus conservatives they have no idea

But are upset in another thread about the disrespect of Bushes service dog .... confused

no one is criticizing what he did at age 14. For the fifth time, you are intellectually unable to differentiate between what he did at age 14, and admitting as an adult that he feels no remorse about what he did at age 14.

Two different things. it’s not about what he did, not at all. It’s that he doesn’t feel bad about what he was forced to do. As steve croft said in the 60 minutes interview, being forced to collaborate with nazis as a kid, would send a lot of people ( all normal people) to the psychiatrists couch.

No one is attacking him for what he did at age 14. He’s being criticized for feeling no remorse about it as an adult. Those are two different things.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

They did cover it, said that it was wrong. I didn't try anything. I'm not in the camp. I don't care if he collaborated or not. I don't care about your definition of collaboration. I don't care about his excuses of being 14 or if he didn't do it someone else would. I don't care that there were many Jews that collaborated or cooperated with the NAZIs in order to save their lives. I don't care that Jews hunted out these turncoats later and prosecuted them.

I posted the video because Spence kept telling Jim to "read the Snopes." While, at the same time, Spence was trying to demonize the Koch brothers with the overused and inaccurate dog whistle accusation of being "radical." That was the con job that I thought was hypocritical--that Soros is not, as Jim suggests, the counterbalance to the Koch brothers, rather Soros is Justified, the Koch bros. are not.

Spence likes to accuse Trump of being a con artist. Spence is a slick con artist. But that's OK. Because Spence has class.

Trump has class, haven’t you seen the pictures of his stuff, like apartment, wife, plane, golf course.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You're another slick con artist.

Come on, this is a 3rd grade level of critical thinking here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Spence the con speaks.

Spence is desperate. Butthurt like the rest of the babies who are 1/4 of the way through their nightmare. I find it amusing to watch the daily dance . Hahahahahaha
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I didn’t mean for the 3rd grade reference to bring out the 8 year old in you Mr President. Next you’ll be spouting petty nonesense like dangles.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The con continues.

But Snopes. Snopes!!!

You should read it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device