And red flags here Spence ?
"Because the emails were housed on her private account, the process was overseen by Clinton and her aides, not archivists like it would have been if the email was housed on government servers."
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

A perfect way to "edit" your legacy. God I hope she isn't out next president.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Massive? Seven distasteful emails (out of 10 years' worth of emails?) and the fact that blacks account for a greater percentage of stops and arrests than they do of the general population. Which means exactly zilch if blacks represent that same proportion of people who actually break the law.

Come on, Spence. If there's racism in that PD, it needs to be fixed, but their chief of police isn't running for President.

"Clinton - tells agency to release all emails "

How do we know what she deleted?

Ferguson is a local matter, Clinton's character is obviously a national concern if she's running for POTUS...she may get an actual challenge from Lie-awatha.

I'm thinking the Trey Gowdy renewed vigor into Clinton could backfire big time.

He's going to stir the pot and dig deeper, likely find nothing, and exonerate her in the process...just wait and see.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Not if she testifies truthfully.

It will be a tall task to exonerate her stupidity in this instance. This was reckless at best for a person of her position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Whiplash effect. Because of who she is, the more outrageous the offense once it turns out there's no there there the more likely it goes away.

Guilty before proven innocent. God bless America.

She said she never emailed classified information . Do you think that is true ?
She said she only has one email because she didn't want to carry two phones . Clearly BS . Maybe if you're 90 you buy that excuse but do you Spence ? Everyone I know has two or more emails on one phone . I have work and personal .
We won't get the server and I'm sure the hard drive has been destroyed .
Acting guilty as sin that's for sure .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I think it's believable. Even Senator Harman came out today and said they don't really email around classified info.

I don't have two emails on one phone, neither does my wife.

The server was already set up by Bill. I think they just looked at the simple solution, saw that it would be legal and didn't think how things could go sour. Poor judgement but not necessarily scandal worthy.

If someone has evidence of wrong doing there's a legal process to get the server. Otherwise I don't think this goes any further.

She said the reason she didn't have two emails if she didn't want to carry around two Devices and that in retrospect maybe she should've carried around two devices. It's a pathetic excuse. Everybody I know has their work email and then their personal email. And I have it on 1 phone . You and your wife have to get with the times
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't have email on my phone, period.....

Neither does my mom 😊
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There is also a "Classification" called Unclassified but Sensitive....which is data that should be for official use only.

Nobody can tell me that as Secretary of State that most of her e-mail correspondence doesn't fall, at the very least, into this category.

I call it pretty damn irresponsible of her to step outside of the D.O.D. network and bypass the safeguards that are in place.

Unless that's Bill Gates I wouldn't exactly call her husband an IT super-guru.

Knowing Bill, He probably used it to host the Whitehouse.com website :hihi:

If that was the case the GOP would already have hard evidence that Clinton had broken the law, when it appears clear that the law doesn't prohibit employees from using private email.

A more interesting question may be which Republican leaked the information to the NY Times to start this whole mess? Have you considered that it's just a manufactured scandal to disrupt the timing Hillary's Presidential announcement?

we really need to start a thread criticizing Satan.... so that Spence can spend several pages defending, excusing, explaining in a positive light and putting into context ...Satan

Really? Link to where it shows that?
The clintonemail.com domain was registered in early January 2009, a couple weeks Obama's inauguration. Now if it was attached to a Clinton domain already running on a server in their house basement, which domain would that be? Clintonfoundation.org being hosted not in there basement at the time (and currently hosted with Microsoft O365)

On a side note there are rules and laws on official correspondence and sensitive data that applied prior to 2014.

Absolutely correct. Most tech guys understand how blatantly bad this is from a security standpoint and how most of the email is sensitive, even if its the lunch order from the caf.

A home server running MS Exchange, in the basement of a home (even guarded by Secret Service), accessible via OWA, connected to an Optima Online cable modem is NOT, repeat NOT, secure.

:hihi::hihi: - Had not seen that one mentioned in a while. Too afraid to check

True, the law doesn't seem to prohibit private email.

However...last night Megyn Kelly said there is a document that every state dept empolyee is required to sign...the document is an affadavit, whereby the signee is stating, under criminal penalty of perjury, that upon their departure from the State Dept, they have turned over all files and communictions related to work. The files are required to be turned over upon their departure from the state department, not two years later, which was when Hilay finally got around to doing it.

IF Megyn Kelly is correct...than if she signed that document, I think one could make a compelling case that she broke the law. If she didn't sign the document, why not?

That woukd only work if Sataan was a registered Democrat...

She can have as many e-mail accounts as she wants.

The problem comes from her using an Unsecure account to e-mail sensitive material. As Secretary of State I would think that all communications done in the context of her job are considered Sensitive Material.

Anything from Travel itineraries to Phone numbers to when one of her aides is picking up little Susie from daycare can be used by unscrupulous types that get their hands on that info.

Keep it Safe, Keep it Secure

It would have been worth hacking her email just to know which yoga class to avoid 😵
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device