Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/index.php)
-   Political Threads (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/forumdisplay.php?f=66)
-   -   breonna taylor tragedy (http://www.striped-bass.com/Stripertalk/showthread.php?t=96904)

scottw 09-24-2020 08:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201479)
You've bc a #^&#^&#^&#^& too.

Seems like a common thing for the rightys here. RR and then SD were evicted from a slum that allows pretty much anything. The way Jim talks to people here with his anger - he should be next.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post

Very impressive. And note that what he chose to include and exclude, all helps serve The Narrative.




Quote: Paul S- "OK tough guy what exactly did I chose to exclude?
I really doubt you have many friends the way you talk to people bc you really come across as a #^&#^&#^&#^&."




what exactly did he say? it's funny that you attack him over "anger issues"

PaulS 09-24-2020 09:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1201484)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post

Very impressive. And note that what he chose to include and exclude, all helps serve The Narrative.




Quote: Paul S- "OK tough guy what exactly did I chose to exclude?
I really doubt you have many friends the way you talk to people bc you really come across as a #^&#^&#^&#^&."




what exactly did he say? it's funny that you attack him over "anger issues"
That I choose to exclude something to help serve the narrative. The anger issues go beyond this thread.

You have to admit you do come across as a #^&#^&#^&#^& with your constant snarkiness.

scottw 09-24-2020 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201485)

That I choose to exclude something to help serve the narrative.

.
this triggered you?...sounds like it's more about you than him....in the future just be fair and don't exclude things to serve your narrative:)

PaulS 09-24-2020 09:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1201486)
this triggered you?...sounds like it's more about you than him....in the future just be fair and don't exclude things to serve your narrative:)
I'm not triggered but good attempt

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence (Post 1201473)
Everyone was saying it because a no knock warrant is what was initially issued. After it was determined Breonna Taylor had no criminal history they were advised to knock. I don't think this was public info until this week. Even though, a pounding on the door before bursting through doesn't make much of a difference. You likely don't have time to realize what's going on. I had a home invasion once, it was a blur.


Not people, a single person said they heard the cops say police. Several others nearby said they only heard the knock.


Her boyfriend at the time was not a drug dealer and was not on the warrant. Breonna Taylor was on the warrant because the police were suspicious she was handling drugs for a former boyfriend who is a drug dealer. This claim was investigated by the Postal Inspector before the search and found to be untrue. The police moved forward anyway.


That's because you don't take the time to read basic and readily available reporting.

Also note there are claims that the police tried to cover up their actions by trying to get the actual drug dealer to lie and say Breonna Taylor was involved in a crime syndicate.

It does seem a little crazy that the only charges filed had nothing to do with Breonna Taylor's death but around the shots fired into an adjacent apartment. Had George Floyd not happened this whole event would have just been swept under the rug.



"It does seem a little crazy that the only charges filed had nothing to do with Breonna Taylor's death "

So you feel that if the cops are shot at first (not in dispute), and they return fire, if they kill an innocent bystander, they should go to prison? THAT'S what you're saying? You think it should be a crime if they miss their aim?

God almighty, man. How can you say that with a straight face?

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201485)
That I choose to exclude something to help serve the narrative. The anger issues go beyond this thread.

You have to admit you do come across as a #^&#^&#^&#^& with your constant snarkiness.
So it's a coincidence you left out the trivial little detail that the guy in the apartment fired first (even he admits this), and that he shot a cop. In your itemized list of facts, you just happened to exclude that little insignificant item?

This is today's left, Paul. Facts don't matter.

Trump is Hitler. He's a dictator. Cops are racist assassins. Blacks can't get ahead. Pro life people hate women. Advocates of legal immigration hate Latinos. It never stops, and it's all bullsh*t. It's only what one does, when one knows they can't win with the truth.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1201486)
this triggered you?...sounds like it's more about you than him....in the future just be fair and don't exclude things to serve your narrative:)
Only I get triggered. It's all cool when he does it.

spence 09-24-2020 10:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201489)
"It does seem a little crazy that the only charges filed had nothing to do with Breonna Taylor's death "

So you feel that if the cops are shot at first (not in dispute), and they return fire, if they kill an innocent bystander, they should go to prison? THAT'S what you're saying? You think it should be a crime if they miss their aim?

God almighty, man. How can you say that with a straight face?
One of the officers is looking at up to 15 years as things sit now.

PaulS 09-24-2020 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201490)
So it's a coincidence you left out the trivial little detail that the guy in the apartment fired first (even he admits this), and that he shot a cop. In your itemized list of facts, you just happened to exclude that little insignificant item?He fired bc he thought there was a home invasion - he didn't hear the cops - 11 of 12 neighbors didn't hear the cops either. he also called 911 and said his home was being invaded. If you invade someone's house you should expect people will defend themselves.

This is today's left, Paul. Facts don't matter.

Trump is Hitler. He's a dictator. Cops are racist assassins. Blacks can't get ahead. Pro life people hate women. Advocates of legal immigration hate Latinos. It never stops, and it's all bullsh*t. It's only what one does, when one knows they can't win with the truth.
Should we go through all the things the right says - and the lies of the Repub. Pres?

Chants of lock her up for an innocent person. Chants of send her back for an American citizen. Real classy people. It never stops and shows what a bunch of classless people there are.

PaulS 09-24-2020 10:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201491)
Only I get triggered. It's all cool when he does it.
Seems like you get triggered pretty much every time you post.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201482)
And I said previously that of about a dozen neighbors, 1 thought he heard the cops. He could have been mistaken or the others could not have heard.

What difference does it make who shot first - the boyfriend thought it was a home invasion and said that on the 911 call to the POLICE.

Where is the body cam video?
one SAID he heard the cops. Why did you choose to say he "thought" he heard the cops?

And if it just came out that it wasn't a no-knock warrant, why did the meduia run with that? WHy can't they ever, ever get one of these right? You don't see a pattern here of all of them being wrong, and ALWAYS being wrong in a way that helps the liberal cause? None of their 'mistakes' ever help republicans, ever.

Darren Wilson shot Michael Brown who was simply begging for his life, saying hands up don't shoot.

The Duke lacrosse players were obviously guilty.

Nick Sandman is a white supremacist.

Breonna Taylor was gunned down by racist cops who busted in there guns a-blazin'.

They're obviously ignoring facts and truth, to spin a narrative that helps their cause. And cops are dying because of it. And you either deny it or defend it.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201494)
Seems like you get triggered pretty much every time you post.
Or, you play that card because you can't respond to what I'm saying.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201493)
Should we go through all the things the right says - and the lies of the Repub. Pres?

Chants of lock her up for an innocent person. Chants of send her back for an American citizen. Real classy people. It never stops and shows what a bunch of classless people there are.
"He fired bc he thought there was a home invasion - he didn't hear the cops "

I concede he might not have heard them, and therefore his shooting was justified,

BUT CAN YOU LOOK AT IT FROM THE COPS PERSPECTIVE FOR TWO SECONDS?

You announce yourself, you enter legally, someone starts shooting and hits the man next to you.

You have ONEW response, you return fire.

You're putting cops in a situation where they cannot win. If they never return fire for fear of being imprisoned, bad guys will get away and hurt other people, and then you'll be complaining that they didn't do their jobs.

All you're doing, is seeing this from the liberal victim side.

Obviously, returning fire was justified, and in real life, that means anyone in the vicinity is in serious danger. Tragedies will happen, there is no way to avoid it.

Paul, I keep asking, but no one will answer...what evidence is there, that race played any role whatsoever?

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence (Post 1201492)
One of the officers is looking at up to 15 years as things sit now.
As always, you responded to something I didn't ask. I asked if you think it's a crime, for a police officer to return fire and kill a bystander accidentally? Because your side is upset that he wasn't charged in her death. To charge a cop in her death, necessarily means you think it's a crime to return fire and accidentally miss. What would have to happen, for you to respond to what I said? To respond to what I actually said?

He's not going to get any real time, then we'll riot all over again.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 10:57 AM
The only way to charge a cop with Taylors death, is to believe that when cops are shot at (and even shot), and they return fire, that its a crime if they miss. You're saying that in a justified shooting situation, cops should go to prison if they accidentally miss. How can any sane person believe that?

And is there any evidence, that race played any kind of a role?

Flush the truth down the toilet, start the liberal spin.

PaulS 09-24-2020 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201499)
Or, you play that card because you can't respond to what I'm saying.
No, I said it bc you said it is cool when I get triggered but you constantly insult people here. Is it bc your get triggered or are you just that type of person?

Pete called you out and said to call him a pussy to his face and you ran away.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201493)
Should we go through all the things the right says - and the lies of the Repub. Pres?

Chants of lock her up for an innocent person. Chants of send her back for an American citizen. Real classy people. It never stops and shows what a bunch of classless people there are.
I agree with you that there are plenty of republican liars.

Here's the difference...(1) I can admit the sleaziness on my side, none of you can. (2) those lies are not told to work a mob into a rage, knowing that cops will get hurt as a result, that citizens will also get hurt and have their property destroyed.

Paul, how many cops got shot because of the "lock her up" chant? How many tea party riots were there, how much arson?

scottw 09-24-2020 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201503)

Pete called you out and said to call him a pussy to his face and you ran away.
are you ok?...should you be distance learning with your 6th grade class or something?

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 11:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201503)
No, I said it bc you said it is cool when I get triggered but you constantly insult people here. Is it bc your get triggered or are you just that type of person?

Pete called you out and said to call him a pussy to his face and you ran away.
I don't constantly insult people here. Takes a lot to get me to get to that point. I need to be better, I agree.

Pete is repulsive. He has gone after my mother and TDFs daughters (with zero criticism from you, by the way; when I pointed that out to you, you said you didn't care; your disdain for insults is quite selectrive). Hes not brave enough to answer a simple question here, but is a keyboard tough guy.

How am I supposed to respond to his threat (which you're right, I ignored)? I thought ignoring it was best. If I met him face to face, hed go in to a fetal position and suck his thumb.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201503)
No, I said it bc you said it is cool when I get triggered but you constantly insult people here. Is it bc your get triggered or are you just that type of person?

Pete called you out and said to call him a pussy to his face and you ran away.
How do you diagnose someone as being triggered by reading what they write? Answer - any time I win, you dismiss me as being angry. Easier than admitting I might ever have a point. God forbid.

PaulS 09-24-2020 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201508)
How do you diagnose someone as being triggered by reading what they write? Answer - any time I win, you dismiss me as being angry. Easier than admitting I might ever have a point. God forbid.
How do you win? You start out threads with insults. That isn't winning. When someone gets tired of the back and forth, it isn't bc you won it is just they don't want to have 5 pages of the same thing over and over.

Calling people pussy or the other things you constantly insult people with isn't winning.

I came back to answer one of your earlier posts about charging the cops but you can't help but throw an insult so why bother.

You can say to yourself you won.

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 12:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS (Post 1201509)
How do you win? You start out threads with insults. That isn't winning. When someone gets tired of the back and forth, it isn't bc you won it is just they don't want to have 5 pages of the same thing over and over.

Calling people pussy or the other things you constantly insult people with isn't winning.

I came back to answer one of your earlier posts about charging the cops but you can't help but throw an insult so why bother.

You can say to yourself you won.
I win by being right. When I point out that you left out that they were fired upon first and one of the cops was hit...and I ask how anyone can think that missing your aim is necessarily a crime, and no one can respond except to lob insults, that means you win.

Again, how come you don't care about Pete's insults?

Answer: A der der.

spence 09-24-2020 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201501)
As always, you responded to something I didn't ask. I asked if you think it's a crime, for a police officer to return fire and kill a bystander accidentally? Because your side is upset that he wasn't charged in her death. To charge a cop in her death, necessarily means you think it's a crime to return fire and accidentally miss. What would have to happen, for you to respond to what I said? To respond to what I actually said?

He's not going to get any real time, then we'll riot all over again.
I still don't understand how only one of the cops could get charged. While I'm sure they used forensics to identify which gun's bullets entered the other apartment they were all blasting away. So one gets charged for not being as good of a shot? What if he had killed the pregnant woman or her 5 year old?

I don't think you could get a felony murder charge, but the entire way the operation was run was extremely reckless. The reforms announced are a drop in the bucket as to what's needed.

Another big item, if you don't believe you're a lawbreaker, why would you ever think the police would force entry into your castle? Kenneth Walker thought it was a home invasion, doesn't he have a right to self defense? Where is the 2A crowd on this one?

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence (Post 1201511)
I still don't understand how only one of the cops could get charged. While I'm sure they used forensics to identify which gun's bullets entered the other apartment they were all blasting away. So one gets charged for not being as good of a shot? What if he had killed the pregnant woman or her 5 year old?

I don't think you could get a felony murder charge, but the entire way the operation was run was extremely reckless. The reforms announced are a drop in the bucket as to what's needed.

Another big item, if you don't believe you're a lawbreaker, why would you ever think the police would force entry into your castle? Kenneth Walker thought it was a home invasion, doesn't he have a right to self defense? Where is the 2A crowd on this one?
so you don' think they had a legal right to return fire? Or are you saying the crime was missing their target? Regarding Taylors death, I see the tragedy. I don't see a crime. What was the crime?

ARe you saying, or are you not saying, that missing your target and hitting someone else, should put you in jail? It's against the law to miss? What law is that?

wdmso 09-24-2020 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1201437)
nobody is is supporting cops that make bad choices, in nearly every one of these instance it's people, not the cops, that make/made the bad choices that led to their outcomes and that 's who would/should be held accountable, you keep ignoring that part and just reflexively blame the cops
Nobody is supporting cops that make bad choices.. yet you suggest

It Taylor's fault for. Being shot 5 times... ?

Your as bad a Jim defending cops who unloded 20 rounds in to a house killing the only person with out a gun or a criminal record .. then try to suggest your not supporting bad cops :rotflmao:

wdmso 09-24-2020 04:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201445)
wdmso, yes the boyfriend fired first ( which may have been justified if he didn’t hear them announce themselves), and he’s not the one who died. the innocent woman did.

wayne, if the cops are being shot at and they return fire, do you think they should go to jail if they accidentally shoot and kill an innocent bystander by accident?

this is policework. sometimes it’s dangerous and chaotic. it’s not an exact science, and even olympic marksman, shooting in easy circumstances, miss sometimes.

it’s a tragedy. it’s not necessarily a crime, and obviously not murder.

please answer my question - should cops go to prison if they return fire but miss? do you really believe that?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device


Jim 20 rds fired indiscriminately and they killed a defenseless women you can't goto prision if you never make it to court . Its is a crime their no disputing that killing someone with your car is a crime it can be determined to be an accident

But 20 rounds randomly fired into an apartment is no accident or police Training

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 04:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1201521)
Jim 20 rds fired indiscriminately and they killed a defenseless women you can't goto prision if you never make it to court . Its is a crime their no disputing that killing someone with your car is a crime it can be determined to be an accident

But 20 rounds randomly fired into an apartment is no accident or police Training
and they don’t go to court, unless they’re arrested for a crime.

why can’t you guys ever answer a question? what’s the crime?

is there any chance you junk she’s be dead, if the guy with her didn’t shoot a cop? he shot a cop. he may we’ll have not known they were cops ( which means he may not have committed a crime). but if you shout a cop, a hail of gunfire is coming back your way. that's how it works. you think they should
have shot the gun out of his hand in that moment?

how many rounds are cops allowed to fire back when one of them is shot and severs an artery in his leg? is the crime that the woman died? or how many rounds they fired?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 04:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1201519)
Nobody is supporting cops that make bad choices.. yet you suggest

It Taylor's fault for. Being shot 5 times... ?

Your as bad a Jim defending cops who unloded 20 rounds in to a house killing the only person with out a gun or a criminal record .. then try to suggest your not supporting bad cops :rotflmao:
it’s not her fault. but just because someone dies in an accident, doesn’t mean someone else committed murder. do you know what an “accident” is?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

spence 09-24-2020 05:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201522)
and they don’t go to court, unless they’re arrested for a crime.

why can’t you guys ever answer a question? what’s the crime?

is there any chance you junk she’s be dead, if the guy with her didn’t shoot a cop? he shot a cop. he may we’ll have not known they were cops ( which means he may not have committed a crime). but if you shout a cop, a hail of gunfire is coming back your way. that's how it works. you think they should
have shot the gun out of his hand in that moment?

how many rounds are cops allowed to fire back when one of them is shot and severs an artery in his leg? is the crime that the woman died? or how many rounds they fired?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Here’s a simple question for you. If putting 3 rounds into an adjacent apartment could get you 15 years why would putting 6 rounds into a living innocent person be completely overlooked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence (Post 1201527)
Here’s a simple question for you. If putting 3 rounds into an adjacent apartment could get you 15 years why would putting 6 rounds into a living innocent person be completely overlooked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I’ll answer when you answer. which you apparently won’t, because you can’t without looking bonkers.

do you, spence, think it’s a criminal offense to return fire when shot at, and accidentally miss your target?

answer that question as i asked it, and i’ll happily answer yours.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

wdmso 09-24-2020 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT (Post 1201522)
and they don’t go to court, unless they’re arrested for a crime.

why can’t you guys ever answer a question? what’s the crime?

is there any chance you junk she’s be dead, if the guy with her didn’t shoot a cop? he shot a cop. he may we’ll have not known they were cops ( which means he may not have committed a crime). but if you shout a cop, a hail of gunfire is coming back your way. that's how it works. you think they should
have shot the gun out of his hand in that moment?

how many rounds are cops allowed to fire back when one of them is shot and severs an artery in his leg? is the crime that the woman died? or how many rounds they fired?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim the crime is killing an innocent women

How it it a crime

By firing indiscriminately beacause someone fired a shot.

So your logic if police are fired apon from a crowd of protester they are justified in firing indiscriminately into the Crowd.. with out positively IDing the shooter... see now why police need to be better retrained before discharging their weapons .. because if your off 2 inchs at 20ft wheres that round going at 300ft.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 09-24-2020 07:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1201532)
Jim the crime is killing an innocent women

How it it a crime

By firing indiscriminately beacause someone fired a shot.

So your logic if police are fired apon from a crowd of protester they are justified in firing indiscriminately into the Crowd.. with out positively IDing the shooter... see now why police need to be better retrained before discharging their weapons .. because if you off 2 inchs at 20ft wheres that round going at 300ft.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
it’s a crime, punishable by prison, to kill an innocent person accidentally while returning fire?

fortunately, that’s not a crime.

the need for better training is a good idea. charging them with murder? bonkers.

anyway, as always, we see what happens when liberals don’t get their way.

oh hey! since you said there isn’t enough time
to look into a S.C. nominee, look at the timeline for Ginsburgs confirmation.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

scottw 09-25-2020 02:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1201519)
Nobody is supporting cops that make bad choices.. yet you suggest

It Taylor's fault for. Being shot 5 times... ?

Your as bad a Jim defending cops who unloded 20 rounds in to a house killing the only person with out a gun or a criminal record .. then try to suggest your not supporting bad cops :rotflmao:
the police were knocking on her door that night because she'd spent years dating a violent drug dealing criminal....she made bad choices that ultimately led to this tragedy....if she had not dated a violent drug dealing criminal the police would have never been sent to her apartment...is that hard to understand?

George Floyd took a lethal dose of fentanyl that day and got in a car and headed into town and ended up fighting with police....

each of these cases are sad and unfortunate, particularly in Breonna's case.... but in each of these cases the "victims" did a lot of stuff, had a long history of behavior to get them where they ended up and I haven't seen any indication that police racism was somehow a factor...which is what all the screaming, rioting and destruction is about

scottw 09-25-2020 02:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence (Post 1201527)
Here’s a simple question for you. If putting 3 rounds into an adjacent apartment could get you 15 years why would putting 6 rounds into a living innocent person be completely overlooked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
the cop that was charged was in the parking lot....the cops that were not charged were inside the building, one was shot both returned fire, they had cause to discharge their weapons....didn't you just tell Jim to do some research or fact check himself before posting?

scottw 09-25-2020 02:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence (Post 1201511)

Another big item, if you don't believe you're a lawbreaker, why would you ever think the police would force entry into your castle? Kenneth Walker thought it was a home invasion, doesn't he have a right to self defense? Where is the 2A crowd on this one?
Walker is not being charged despite shooting a police officer...again...did you do any research?

scottw 09-25-2020 03:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso (Post 1201521)

Jim 20 rds fired indiscriminately and they killed a defenseless women you can't goto prision if you never make it to court . g

Sergeant Mattingly identified two individuals standing beside one another at the end of the hall, a male and a female. In his statement, he says that the male was holding a gun, arms extended in a shooting stance.

so she wasn't shot in her bed...just for the record

Wayne, if you are at one end of the hall and there are two people at the other end of the hall and one is pointing a gun at you and you see the gun go off and either you or your partner is shot... are you shooting back? or waiting for the next bullet(s) to come your way to see what happens?

TheSpecialist 09-25-2020 07:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. (Post 1201413)
If they did that at my house and I didn’t hear them, they’d be dead
And claiming it’s my responsibility
Welcome to the police state
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
The guy wasn't charged with shooting at the officers in this case though...

Jim in CT 09-25-2020 07:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1201540)
Sergeant Mattingly identified two individuals standing beside one another at the end of the hall, a male and a female. In his statement, he says that the male was holding a gun, arms extended in a shooting stance.

so she wasn't shot in her bed...just for the record

Wayne, if you are at one end of the hall and there are two people at the other end of the hall and one is pointing a gun at you and you see the gun go off and either you or your partner is shot... are you shooting back? or waiting for the next bullet(s) to come your way to see what happens?
he won’t answer the question as you asked.

part two of that question is this: if you do shoot and accidentally hit the wrong one, should
you go to prison?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim in CT 09-25-2020 07:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSpecialist (Post 1201549)
The guy wasn't charged with shooting at the officers in this case though...
yeah but that fact doesn’t serve his narrative, so he changed it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

TheSpecialist 09-25-2020 07:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw (Post 1201536)
the police were knocking on her door that night because she'd spent years dating a violent drug dealing criminal....she made bad choices that ultimately led to this tragedy....if she had not dated a violent drug dealing criminal the police would have never been sent to her apartment...is that hard to understand?

George Floyd took a lethal dose of fentanyl that day and got in a car and headed into town and ended up fighting with police....

each of these cases are sad and unfortunate, particularly in Breonna's case.... but in each of these cases the "victims" did a lot of stuff, had a long history of behavior to get them where they ended up and I haven't seen any indication that police racism was somehow a factor...which is what all the screaming, rioting and destruction is about
Not only was she dating him, she was neck deep in the business. She was not an EMT anymore either, they fired her after a car she rented was found abandoned with a dead body inside. The dead body was an acquaintance of hers. She was on surveillance video entering and exiting a drug distribution house multiple times while her boyfriend was in jail. She was caught on jailhouse recordings discussing his drug business, and how she was handling it while he was in jail.

When a cop shoots someone, to keep themselves from possibly becoming a target, and wanting to go home at the end of their tour the first response from liberals is, "They knew the risk when they took the job". When a criminal is shot by a cop, no liberals has ever said, "They knew the risk of being a criminal", What does that tell you about the liberal mentality...


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.
Page 2 of 4 1 2 34
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com