I'm not talking about the letter, I am talking about what Fox says was leaked to them. Which, of course, may turn out to be b.s. Or not.

ha ha ha ha...:rotf2:

Clinton Campaign Accuses Obama-Appointed IG of Conspiring with GOP on E-mail Report


http://www.nationalreview.com/node/430061/print


she's a special sort of insane...

Spence, from Scott's link...

"The Politico report Fallon (Clinton spokesman) cites claimed that intelligence sources had determined that no “top secret” e-mails were discovered on Clinton’s e-mail server. It was immediately challenged by intelligence-community officials, and Politico itself backtracked in a December 15 story, admitting that two e-mails were, in fact, considered “top secret” at the time they were sent and retained by Clinton. Fallon offered no new evidence to contradict that assertion."

Listen to the bell, Spence, it tolls for thee she.

Spence, did they simply state that Hilary deleted 34,000 e mails that she deemed personal?

Guess she had a lot of yoga classes. :hihi:

Issue already addressed in multiple posts above.

Actually, rule #1 she broke was she created, authorized, and used an unsafe and unregulated system for storing classified information setup and supported by people/organizations that were unauthorized, trained, or properly equipped to maintain such a system.

Even if it was legal (it was not) the simple fact of her running the situation the way she did on a home private email server allowed lots of bad guys to read our mail. Maybe Obama would have had great foreign policy of the Russians and Socialist Chinese were not reading our mail.

You're assuming she intended to store classified information which she clearly didn't intend to nor does it appear that she did.

Well, I believe the Justice Department has already said it wasn't illegal. I've not hear anyone claim it was hacked although it's certainly possible. But if she was using secure systems for classified communications it's not even clear if they could have gained meaningful insights.

Here's the thing that most people are missing. Had she not been using her personal server she would have been using state.gov. All this inter-agency squabbling over classification would have been exactly the same...and they've been having a terrible time keeping the Russians out of that system.

While I agree it would have been proper to use the work system for work, there' doesn't appear have been any legal or otherwise damage done. We'll see what the Feds say...

Step back and look at who you are supporting and forget the party affiliation. Is this really the person you want to hold the highest position in our government? My grandmother isn't a corrupt lying sack of _hit but I still wouldn't have wanted her in charge of the country.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Of course Spence wants her , she will continue the policy's he holds dear and can also parden herself so he can say " I was right , no jail time , move along "
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Agree, we will have to wait, however being she said the only reason she used
her own server was for her convenience, used only for personal reasons, wedding plans etc. and NEVER contained classified info, she still deleted 34,000 e mails while 1300 others were reported classified and 4 reported top secret.
She is a serial liar and how can she be trusted when she changes her story?
Does she know what integrity is?

I'll just leave this here as a lesson on how a pathological liar operates.

http://youtu.be/fJaic2ek8aY
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And yet Politifact say that EVERY Reb. candidate has lied more than her.

Were all the emails in question sent by someone else or where they created by Hillary?

Whether she put the emails on the server or someone else did is not the issue. She as head of the DOS is ultimately responsible for what is on the server. In government responsibility goes up the chain of the command and blame often goes down the chain. Think about how many department heads over the years were forced to resign when something happened on their watch even though they were not directly responsible.

What is troubling to me is that her campaign continues to state that there is no FBI investigation about her server or emails at all. I'm stumped by that.

So if someone had sent top secret files to Colin Powell's private email account, it would have been the same thing?

Yes.

As I understand it, she created the situation where everything needed to be sent to her personal server. Thus, she forced others to send classified material to her personal server. If they had to modify the files in such a way to remove the "top secret" mark so that they could be sent to her server, that's even worse, and she would have to know that people were doing that, in order to send that stuff to her.

Spence said that here, and I was baffled by it. I saw a Hilary apologist on TV last night who said the same thing, she claimed that the FBI has declared that Hilary is not the subject of an investigation.

So what are those 100 FBI agents doing all day?

Not sure - I'm starting to wonder about the veracity of that statement. I would have thought there would have been a statement by the FBI to that effect but I haven't seen it. Just reporters stating their sources are FBI employees.

Thanks

Sure.

One of those deals where Democrats are saying she did nothing wrong, and Republicans are making her out to be the WikiLeaks guy. The truth is likely somewhere in between. Hopefully the investigation is fair and non-political.

It won't stop many Democrats from voting for her, it won't get any Republicans to vote for her. What will it do to the independents? WHo the heck knows.

The fundamental lack of understanding you guys have over this topic is most certainly mind boggling.

Worst of all, bill had a ton of Asian tentacle porn on the server
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This is who the Democrats want to run the country.
http://radaronline.com/celebrity-new...evenue-grants/
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

See, this is why the Internet sucks.

The Clinton foundation doesn't use the vast majority of it's funding for grants, instead it funds charity activities directly because they can get more benefit value for the dollar.

Yet people can write this crap and many just lap it up without any regard for the truth.

I know right??...everyone is an idiot and your steadfast defense of a reprobate is perfectly normal :kewl: something else is quite mind boggling :hee:

So set me straight with some facts over how efficient the foundation is and how it isn't a gravy train for the Clintons. Scandals seem to surround these people that you try and portray as honorable and the beat choice to run the country.
I would be embarrassed to support someone who behaves the way they do.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/klayman/130126
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

And remember when McCain was too old to be president well judging how Hillary is just as old as he was the difference must be the vagina.

In this case...yes, that may be the case.

"your steadfast defense of a reprobate is perfectly normal"


this part anyway:hee:

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm more concerned with who they get the money from
Through 2014 the foundation had raised almost $2 billion from U.S. corporations especially Wall Street; foreign governments and corporations...
No corruption there , I'm sure of it .
Why the duck would you give them the money over other charities ?

I don't know, you have IT guys and guys with security clearances and IT guys with security clearances all telling you what she did was illegal and unsecure, yet the strategic messaging guy does not want believe it could possibly be true.

The mark of a good hacker is the ability to get in, do what you need to do, and get out without anybody ever knowing you were there.

She bypassed security....end of discussion.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Wow......just Wow...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he knows it's true, the strategic message is more important than the truth in every case

Good plan, when you need sound legal council...call tech support.

Because Bill Clinton is a rock star and rich people like to be affiliated with his work.

You forgot about Vince Foster.

That article was written by a founder of Judicial Watch, a fake think tank who's primary purpose is to use FOIA requests to take government records out of context and smear democrats.

I'll bet he's great at parties though.

Funny you list a string of things that are not true then allege she's a liar.

Irony or humor?

If it was revealed that her use of the private server led to some calamity there would likely be some fallout, but to date there isn't any evidence of this.

They don't say there's no FBI investigation, it's that Clinton is not a target of a criminal investigation. This was wrongly reported I think by the NYTimes and just repeated over and over by FOX and all the fake news sites...

Spence - Keep telling yourself it is a vast RWC :laughs::doh:

So spence give me reasons why I should vote for Hillary. Seriously, unless you just like to stir the pot.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device