![]() |
Quote:
How do you know what they knew, when they threw soup on the painting. "“We’re not asking the question, should everyone be throwing soup at paintings?” said Plummer." No, the question we're asking is, "did the bedroom you grew up in, have lead paint on your walls"? "What we’re doing is getting the conversation going" That's self flattery. That conversation has been going for 40 years, this just makes that side look like laughing stocks. |
Its classic was just watching Fox news show Outnumbered
Must be fox's answer to the view I guess And one of the host referred to the Mashed potato Stunt as eco Terrorist .. it just a coincidence Jim made the same claim :rotflmao: |
[QUOTE=scottw;1234482]
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
A liberal, saying it's wrong to judge people on skin color, that's a riot. It's all your side does. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"to know all there is about a protester you've never met " you never post assumptions or opinions about people you've never met? Hmmm? "judgement by action, skin color, age, race yada yada yada" Yes, the right is more concerned with race than the left. Please share more wisdom with us! The left NEVER thinks about race! NEVER! |
Quote:
Totally agree it was stupid but they don't care about that. They want publicity - which they got. They prob. could care less about making $ and are more worried about saving the planet. |
Quote:
Fixed it for you... |
Quote:
these are just clowns looking for attention....:kewl: |
Quote:
However the person who started this thread is the only clown looking for Attention ... with his daily fox outrage Yet it's you guys who are yelling they are terrorist! trying to destroy Art with a can of soup and some superglue Hard Logic to argue with:eyes: |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
of course you can't comprehend the meaning of the photo I posted with these Kids sitting on that counter.. in response to your statement the wussification and dumbing-down of todays kids (even though both incidents happened in england and germany not in the States ) "Now you sound like your father and grandfather and mine .. who I bet laughed when these kids tried to change the world..." or is this just more the wussification and dumbing-down of today's kids or were the people in the photos protesting with the flowers also terrorists and enemies of America or would you just repeat your statement "these kids can't compete because they're stupid, lazy, entitled, snowflakes,":doh: |
Quote:
Aileen Getty has not personally worked in the oil industry and has poured much of her fortune into philanthropic ventures related to the climate crisis its an actual foundation .. by the way not a fraguldent one that was Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Foundation Funds for you know who She co-founded the non-profit Climate Emergency Fund (CEF) in 2019 and has reportedly donated $1m of her personal wealth to be used to support environmental activist groups, including Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion. So with your logic she participated in the defacing of these art works another little bit of information Extinction Rebellion spokesperson Brad Homewood told the Guardian that they did it knowing it would not damage the artwork. "Our intention was always to glue on to the perspex protecting it," he said. |
Quote:
Which is why I said "heiress" and not "CEO". She's an oil billionaire paying people to cause unrest to get off fossil fuels. In other words, she's an unprincipled dingbat. |
she's an unprincipled dingbat.?
Why Just because she’s an heir to an oil industry fortune doesn't mean you necessarily approve of the family business. If that’s your reason. It doesn’t make a lot of sense ? Seems she does a lot with her money .. besides a million dollars to one foundation Getty is HIV positive since 1985 and works for AIDS awareness causes, along with former mother-in-law Elizabeth Taylor. In November 2016, she joined the board of amfAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research. 2013, Getty founded Aileen Getty Foundation, of which she is currently the President. Earlier in 2005, she also founded Gettlove, a nonprofit organization created to acknowledge, house, and sustain housing for numerous homeless individuals who are part of the Los Angeles community. Maybe I should accuse anyone who donated money to Trump . Or the republicans party That they should be considered accomplice’s . In his attempts to steal a national election While also calling them unprincipled dingbats . The unprincipled being True Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If she doesn't approve of the family business, and she actually holds that s a principle, she should turn down the money. If she takes the money, she should shut up. You don't know what a "principle" is. You actually don't know. |
Quote:
And stupid whatabout-ism, at that? |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I know one thing . Jim you’re not a principled person. Your twisted logic make that obvious You do know the business was sold in 1984? Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Never even hinted it’s her fault what family she was born into. but either oil is ok, of its evil. it cannot be both. If it’s ok, it’s fine for her to enjoy her money. if oil is diabolical, she shouldn’t want the proceeds of that diabolical industry. can’t have it both ways. Lefties always want it both ways. if i inherited a billion dolllars from dogfighting, and have $100 a year to PETA while living in mansions and flying in a private jet, that would make me an unprincipled dingbat. |
classic wayne missed the point. or lied
Not really you re enforced what I said it’s fine for her to enjoy her money. if oil is diabolical, she shouldn’t want the proceeds of that diabolical industry. Jim if you inherited millions from dog fighting Bad example but it happened to be legal when the money was made Who cares . You inherited it. It would not be your responsibility to feel guilty or make amends For wealth you had no part in creating Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
In 1988, President Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Act to compensate more than 100,000 people of Japanese descent who were incarcerated in internment camps during World War II. The legislation offered a formal apology and paid out $20,000 in compensation to each surviving victim. Iam sure a petty person like yourself and Scott would have cried about Reagan issuing an official apology and reparations but called it compensation from the United States Or if RI got rid of VJ Day would you be outraged if America issued an apology for slavery Seems you’ve bought into the right wing fantasy that your personally being blamed .. by people who have no idea who you are .. Some of the most cited reasoning for white Americans’ opposition to reparations includes the fact that no one directly involved in the practice is still living, polling data collected by Hunt and Reichelmann shows that about 45% of those polled are opposed to the idea of apologizing to Black Americans even a simple apology is rejected I am shocked Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
who suffered. If you can find anyone today who was a slave, they’ve got a good claim for reparations. 400,000 northern soldiers died to end slavery, that’s a hefty price paid . . shouldnt reparations be laid by the folks who advocated for slavery? namely, democrats? if it weren’t for liberalism, blacks wouldn’t need reparations, they’d be doing fine. |
Quote:
There, can we move on now. Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com