Wayne, how about we wait and see what the Durham criminal probe shows, before we draw a conclusion about whether or not laws were broken (and I hope none were). Durham did come out and say that he disagreed with certain aspects of the IG's conclusions.

I don't know where you got that Durham had nothing to add, his probe is wider, he isn't done yet, and he said very clearly that he disagreed with something the IG report said, which necessarily means he does have something to add.

you can't have an ounce of common sense and actually believe this

"no evidence that any of the mistakes were done with any criminal intent or bias or done on purpose... hence this is usually lack of training."

No need to wait, it will be what Trump and Barr want it to say, it's going to be released when they need a bump and it will be pure spin I'm guessing; just like Barr's spin of the Mueller report.

This is really dumb
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It may well be released when it will help Trump, that doesn't mean that what's in there is wrong. Durham has a very, very impressive resume. The DOJ sent him into the Boston office to clean up the Godawful mess from Whitey Bulger's infiltration, and he did. Worth noting that the US attorney in Boston who allowed the corruption to happen and who was unable to clean it up without Durham doing it for him, was named Robert Mueller.

Hasn't seen a word of the report, but he has already dismissed it.

Nothing that helps Trump, can be valid. Not ever.

He is a broken man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Note: if the IG report said what Trumplicans claim, Bill Barr wouldn't be disputing the findings