![]() |
Quote:
|
be gentle...they are teetering on the edge of sanity....
"Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Quote:
(BTW, Ralph Peters is cool Old School Cold Warrior so by default most lefties would hate him) |
Quote:
“Well, I think we’re really doing well with Russia as of today,” Trump said. “I thought we were doing horrible before today. Really, I mean horribly. Dangerously.” “It was that big? It was that dramatic today?” Hannity asked. “Oh, I thought it was great today,” Trump said. “But I thought it was really bad five hours ago.” Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, if nothing else the Russian hacking did expose the widespread corruption inside the Democratic party to get Clinton nominated.
This should be the real turning point. I'm not condoning the hacking - but we also shouldn't ignore that fact just because it was illegally done by a foreign entity. |
Quote:
|
Now Trump is contradicting his own Intel Chief stating that Russia is no longer targeting the US.
Can anyone rationalize this aside from the idea that our President is beholden to Putin? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyone who thought it was hilarious when Obama mocked Romney for saying Russia was a threat, has exactly zero right to be bitching about Putin's rise. Zero right. We chose to elect a guy who thought it was funny to believe Russia was a concern. SO this is the result. Guess what? When you plant potatoes, you get potatoes? I also remember when Obama was caught on mike telling a Putin lackey, something to the effect of "this is my last election, after it's behind me, I'll have more flexibility in dealing with Russia." Which I took to mean as , "once I'm no longer accountable to the American people, I'll be able to play ball". How else can that be interpreted? But Spence said not to worry... |
I just with the Dems had been more concerned about Russia before the past couple years. I wish the same of Western Europe - that they would be more concerned. RUS broke its economy the past 6-7 years rebuilding its mil and capabilities.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Toadying up to those elites does not garner us respect from them, it just makes them more comfortable with, and more tolerant of, us. And oh, BTW, less nervous that our protection of them might waver. In some ways, certainly economically, Trump is right that West Europeans are foes to us. We Americans are foes to each other, politically, economically, morally, philosophically. And I don't want our President to be "the leader of the free world." I don't even want our President to be the leader of the American People. I want us to be the leaders of our own lives. So, I don't care about the notion that other countries or societies lose "respect" for us. Especially if we have to kiss their azz to get it. |
I agree with you on that respect, that other nations in NATO and for their own benifit, must contribute their fair share. To kiss the arse golden ring, or lick the boots of a known brutal man and leader; well beam me up Scotty there must be sanity in the universe.
|
Quote:
If, going in, the only way to get results is to threaten, disparage, insult, or actually go to war, then Trump got off on the wrong foot with Putin. But that can change, if necessary. And if war is necessary, what will those who claimed and complained that Trump would get us into a war say about that? |
So what ae the desired results from an X super power, with little to offer us and if it’s obtained via cyber meddling or some sort of dirt; does that not raise concerns?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
Official White House transcripts of the press conference conveniently overlooked the part where Putin said he was hoping Trump would win the election
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
I dunno . . . what did China have to offer us when Nixon negotiated with it. It was geopolitically less powerful then than Russia is now. Now, Russia, China, and other nations in both hemispheres are joining each other in an economic relationship whose objective is to replace the US as the hegemonic world economic and military power, and to replace the dollar as the reserve currency. Is there some possibility to change the direction of that movement? Is there a way, peacefully, over time, to draw all nations into a worldwide economic and cultural competition and/or cooperation that benefits everybody? Does Western Europe's disinclination to powerfully arm itself open the door to Russian and Eastern powers to threaten it and thus embolden those powers to destroy and dominate rather than come to the table and create a diverse worldwide community of friendly competitors? I don't know what's in Trump's mind. And I don't understand how so many anti-Trumpers absolutely claim to know what he thinks or why he says and does what he does. He's done some good things. Maybe there's more to come. I'm not all hyperbolic about him destroying Western Civilization, nor this country. He claims to be a negotiator. Negotiators operate differently than adversaries or warmongers. Maybe you're right that he'll eff everything up. I don't think he even has the power to do so. I prefer to wait until Trump actually does something rather than bitch about what I "know" he'll do. And what has been going on up till now ain't all that good . . . at least it appears few think it is if all the screeching from all directions means anything. It has the appearance of OK to some, but others see a worldwide rise in national debts and the direction unabatedly continuing that way. And there are all the degradations of long standing social norms that have no definition or basic meaning . . . or the political animosities . . . or the ever-present potential for war. . . yada yada yada, you know the drill. Hey, to rephrase a Beatles' mantra, "give Trump a chance." OK, OK, I realize y'all can't do that . . . y'all continue on with your nice hyperventilation. I'll step aside as the ignorant dummie while y'all really good experts and wizard fortune tellers tell us what's really going on. Hey, you win again. Maybe, like Trump said, you'll get tired of winning. |
Quote:
President Donald Trump will consider allowing Russian investigators to question U.S.-born investor Bill Browder, former U.S. ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul and others after President Vladimir Putin floated the idea, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Wednesday. “He said it was an interesting idea. He didn’t commit to anything,” Sanders said at the daily press briefing. “He wants to work with his team and determine if there’s any validity that would be helpful to the process…It was an idea they threw out.” Later in the day, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert called the concept "absolutely absurd." Appears the Head is losing contact with the rest of the body ... But again Conservatives are silent on this Suggestion... I guess because he was Obama's ambassador Michael McFaul.... and U.S.-born investor Bill Browder (english citizen ) over Clinton mystery money |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the very long run, I think eventually we need Russia, China, NK; I personally would hope this world isn't going to keep moving on the way it is with everyone looking out for just their own interest and boarders? I'm pretty sure Putin isn't ready to sit down and play nice in the global sand box and neither is NK; China however is moving itself forward better then anyone probably gives them credit for. Putin and Trump are so similar in their need to be seen in a certain light, the summit was like watching a mutual admiration society meeting. |
Here is an opinion of Trumps effect on The Worlds economy
We are part of it https://www.theguardian.com/business...e_iOSApp_Other Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Quote:
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com